MySpace


The Queer Revolution



Last Updated: 3/20/2009

Send Message
Instant Message
Email to a Friend
Subscribe

State: Oklahoma

Blog Archive
[Older      Newer]
 /  / 
Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:34 PM

Current mood:  optimistic
Category: Jobs, Work, Careers
from Monster.com:
__________________________
Subtle Prejudice Still Exists for Gays and Lesbians at Work
by Dan Woogm, Monster.com Contributing Writer

When the USS Enterprise needs its protective shield, every ounce of energy goes toward protecting the starship. Lights dim; the crew can't cook.

Warren Blumenfeld cites that analogy to describe gay men and lesbians in certain workplaces. The author of Homophobia: How We All Pay the Price says that even in supposedly progressive workplaces and forward-looking states, employees -- including those already out -- expend enormous energy maintaining a defensive shield against subtle prejudice.


The Monday Morning Pronoun Problem

"Despite the distance gays have come, we've still got the 'Monday morning pronoun problem,'" Blumenfeld says. "We change who we spend our life with, because we fear ostracism. We fear straining relationships with coworkers, bosses and clients. We hear adults say things like, 'That's so gay,' so we feel we have to maintain a certain distance from others."

"In this era of not wanting to be considered bigots, we don't see anti-gay rants anymore," Blumenfeld continues. "But just because it's not overtly expressed doesn't mean everyone's opinion has changed. The rude jokes and bullying are gone; now it's more subtle."


Taboo Subjects

Brian McNaught, a corporate trainer specializing in GLBT issues whose clients include many Fortune 500 companies, says that while a lot of employers have nondiscrimination policies, their corporate cultures may not be supportive of gays and lesbians. At a conference last year, he asked 200 GLBT employees, "How many of you work for a company with a 100 percent rating from the Human Rights Campaign but nevertheless do not feel safe and valued at work?" A majority raised their hands.

This feeling can be felt through the fear of straight employees asking gay coworkers, "How was your weekend?" or "Who's that in the photo on your desk?"

"People don't know how to have that conversation, so they don't say anything," McNaught explains. "That leads to silence, so everyone thinks the subject is taboo."


Selective Corporate Policy

Although 16 states have laws banning employment discrimination based on sexual orientation, 34 do not. And in all 50 states, subtle anti-gay discrimination takes place. For example, life and health insurance benefits or use of the gym may extend to legal spouses but not same-sex partners.

But most major American corporations do have policies prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, McNaught says. "They truly want to attract and retain the best and brightest employees. But many of them don't follow up by helping all employees understand the connection between sexual orientation and the workplace. The result is that most heterosexuals feel like people in a foreign country who don't know the language. There is high anxiety, ignorance and fear. The coping mechanism is avoidance."

Subtle discrimination can be seen in bereavement or sick-spouse leave policies, too. Though gay employees may use it, colleagues may not understand. "We still hear things like, 'Oh, that was just your roommate. You don't need a month off,'" Blumenfeld says.


Skewed Social Dynamics

Subtle prejudices can be seen in other ways, he notes. "If you're not out or partnered, it's assumed you're heterosexual. Coworkers try to fix you up with someone of the opposite sex. You're not interested, but you don't want to offend anyone. And to advance in many businesses, it helps to have a 'power spouse' -- a trophy wife or husband to help you move up the corporate ladder."

Women are often discriminated against more than men in the workplace, Blumenfeld says. Subtle prejudice may be worse against lesbians than gay males. Promotions can be denied when managers say, "She's not supporting a family." Blumenfeld adds: "A gay man is still a man in the workplace. He's not accorded as much respect as a heterosexual man, but a white male still has two things in his favor."

 

Change Will Come

McNaught is optimistic that even subtle discrimination will fade. "The workplace culture changes for the better every day," he says. "As younger workers join the ranks and bring with them broader experience with gay people, the social interactions which can be so awkward on Monday morning today will become natural and easy. We've come a long way since 1974, when I was fired for being gay. We're making enormous progress. But cultures change slowly. We all need to be patient and have a sense of humor."

In the meantime, McNaught suggests gay and lesbian workers can address the feeling of being marginalized by:

• Taking the Lead: Communicate -- to your degree of comfort -- that you're interested in participating in social chatter.

• Taking Charge: Speak privately to your manager. Affirm your desire to stay in the department and suggest a diversity presentation that will build your colleagues' comfort levels.

• Going to Human Resources: Explain the situation and ask for advice.

• Contacting an Expert:
Brian McNaught, for one, is happy to brainstorm with you. You can also solicit insights and feedback on the Diversity at Work message board.

Currently listening:
This Island
By Le Tigre
Release date: 19 October, 2004
Saturday, May 12, 2007 8:03 PM

Current mood:  refreshed
Category: News and Politics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 The Stonewall riots were a series of violent conflicts between New York City police officers and groups of gay and transgender people that began on June 28, 1969, and lasted several days. Also called the Stonewall Rebellion or simply Stonewall, the clash was a watershed for the worldwide gay rights movement, as gay and transgender people had never before acted together in such large numbers to forcibly resist police.

History:

Law enforcement raids on gay bars and nightclubs were a regular part of gay life in cities across the United States, until the 1960s, when sudden raids on bars in many major cities became markedly less frequent. Most conclude that the decline in raids can be attributed to a series of court challenges and increased resistance from the Homophile Movement.

Prior to 1965, the police would sometimes record the identities of all those present at a raid; occasionally provide the information to newspapers for publication. Police used any convenient justification to make arrests on charges of indecency including kissing, holding hands, cross dressing - even merely being in the bar at the time of the raid.

In 1965, two important figures came into prominence. The first was John Lindsay, a liberal Republican who was elected mayor of New York City on a reform platform. The other was Richard Leitsch, who became president of the New York City chapter of the Mattachine Society at around the same time. Leitsch was considered relatively militant compared to his predecessors and believed in direct action techniques commonly used by other civil rights groups in the 1960s.

In early 1966, administration policies had changed because of complaints made by Mattachine that the police were on the streets entrapping gay men and charging them with indecency. The police commissioner, Howard Leary, instructed the police force not to lure gays into breaking the law and also required that any plain clothes officers must have a civilian witness when a gay person was arrested. This policy caused entrapment of gay men to become much less common in New York City.

In the same year, in order to challenge the State Liquor Authority (SLA) regarding its policies over gay bars, Leitsch conducted a "sip in." Leitsch had called members of the press and planned on meeting at a bar with two other gay men—a bar could have its liquor license taken away for knowingly serving a group of three or more homosexuals—to test the SLA policy of closing bars. When the bartender at Julius turned them away, they made a complaint.

The question then remains why the Stonewall was raided if gay bars were legal and on the rise. John D'Emilio, a prominent historian, points out that the city was in the middle of a mayoral campaign and John Lindsay, who had lost his party's primary, had reason to call for a cleanup of the city's bars. There were a number of reasons that made the Stonewall Inn an easy target: it operated without a liquor license; had ties to organized crime; and, "offering scantily clad go-go boys as entertainment, it brought an 'unruly' element to Sheridan Square".

Race may have been another factor. The Stonewall bar was heavily frequented by gay blacks and Hispanics. The decision by the police to raid the bar may have been influenced by the fact that most of the "homosexuals" they would encounter were of black ancestry, and therefore even more objectionable. A large percentage of the rioters were also black men.

Many of those present were transgender and/or drag queens.

Deputy Inspector Seymour Pine, who led the raid on the bar that first night, claims that he was ordered to close the Stonewall Inn because it was the central location for gathering information on gay men who worked on Wall Street. A recent increase in the number of thefts from brokerage houses on Wall Street led police to suspect that gay men, forced by blackmail, were behind the thefts. The patrons of the Stonewall were used to such raids and the management was generally able to reopen for business either the same night or the following day.

The Stonewall Raid and the Aftermath

On Saturday morning, June 28, 1969, not long after 1:20 a.m., police raided the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in Greenwich Village. A number of factors differentiated the raid that took place on June 28 from other such raids on the Stonewall Inn. In general, the sixth precinct tipped off the management of the Stonewall Inn prior to a raid. In addition, raids were generally carried out early enough in the night to allow business to return to normal for the peak hours of the night. At approximately 1:20 a.m., much later than the usual raid, eight officers from the first precinct, of which only one was in uniform, entered the bar. Most of the patrons were able to escape being arrested as the only people arrested "would be those without IDs, those dressed in the clothes of the opposite gender, and some or all of the employees"

Details about how the riot started vary from story to story. According to one account, a transgender woman named Sylvia Rivera threw a bottle at a police officer after being prodded by his nightstick. Another account states that a lesbian, being brought to a patrol car through the crowd put up a struggle that encouraged the crowd to do the same. Whatever the case may be, mêlée broke out across the crowd—which quickly overtook the police. Stunned, the police retreated into the bar. Heterosexual folk singer Dave van Ronk, who was walking through the area, was grabbed by the police, pulled into the bar, and beaten. The crowd's attacks were unrelenting. Some tried to light the bar on fire. Others used a parking meter as a battering ram to force the police officers out. Word quickly spread of the riot and many residents, as well as patrons of nearby bars, rushed to the scene.

Throughout the night the police singled out many transgender people and gender nonconformists, including butch women and effeminate men, among others, often beating them. On the first night alone 13 people were arrested and four police officers, as well as an undetermined number of protesters, were injured. It is known, however, that at least two rioters were severely beaten by the police. Bottles and stones were thrown by protesters who chanted "Gay Power!" The crowd, estimated at over 2000, fought with over 400 police officers.

The police sent additional forces in the form of the Tactical Patrol Force, a riot-control squad originally trained to counter Vietnam War protesters. The tactical patrol force arrived to disperse the crowd. However, they failed to break up the crowd, who sprayed them with rocks and other projectiles.

Eventually the scene quieted, but the crowd returned again the next night. While less violent than the first night, the crowd had the same energy as it had on the previous night. Skirmishes between the rioters and the police ensued until approximately 4:00 a.m.. The third day of rioting fell five days after the raid on the Stonewall Inn. On that Wednesday, 1,000 people congregated at the bar and again caused extensive property damage.

Legacy

The forces that were simmering before the riots were now no longer beneath the surface. The community created by the homophile organizations of the previous two decades had created the perfect environment for the creation of the Gay Liberation Movement. By the end of July the Gay Liberation Front (GLF) was formed in New York and by the end of the year the GLF could be seen in cities and universities around the country. Similar organizations were soon created around the world including Canada, France, Britain, Germany, Belgium, The Netherlands, Australia and New Zealand.

The following year, in commemoration of the Stonewall Riots, the GLF organized a march from Greenwich Village to Central Park. Between 5,000 and 10,000 men and women attended the march. Many gay pride celebrations choose the month of June to hold their parades and events to celebrate "The Hairpin Drop Heard Round the World" (D'Emilio 232). Many major American cities including New York City, Chicago, Houston, San Francisco, Seattle, Minneapolis and Columbus as well as other cities such as Toronto hold Gay Pride Marches on the last Sunday of June, in honor of Stonewall. Other cities such as Anchorage, Baltimore, Des Moines, Detroit, Kansas City, Atlanta and Washington, DC hold their pride parade in June but not on the last Sunday of the month. Still others, such as Dallas, Texas and Palm Springs, California, hold their celebration in another month entirely. The prominent British gay rights group Stonewall is named after the riots. Numerous gay bars around the world take their name from the revolutionary bar - two of the most famous are The Stonewall and Moose Lounge in Allentown, Pennsylvania and Bar Stonewall in Sydney, Australia.

The general atmosphere of the days immediately before the riots are dramatized in a 1995 film called Stonewall. In the Quantum Leap episode titled Running For Honor (1992), Sam Beckett saves a former Naval cadet from a gay-bashing gang. This allows the ex-cadet to go to work at the Stonewall Bar, which is noted as the birthplace of gay liberation.

In 1998. a LGBT-rights group in the United States formed the Stonewall Democrats (affiliated with the Democratic Party). The group was founded by Barney Frank, a gay Democratic member of the U.S. House of Representatives representing Massachusetts's fourth congressional district.

The actual Stonewall Inn was vacant and closed for most of the 1970s and '80s. It reopened after its first renovation in the early 1990s. A second renovation in the late 1990s brought in new crowds to its new multi-floor layout. The club remained popular until management lost its lease in 2006. New management expect to reopen the latest version of The Stonewall in February 2007.

On the 2006 anniversary of the Stonewall Riots, Iceland enacted a law to grant same-sex couples legal rights equal with those of heterosexual couples. Religious organizations still do not have the right to confirm a same-sex union in the country, however, replacing it with a "blessing."

Currently listening:
Stonewall: Music From The Motion Picture
By Various Artists
Release date: 04 June, 1996
Thursday, April 26, 2007 7:52 PM

Current mood:hopeful
Category: News and Politics

By Mike Penner

During my 23 years with The Times' sports department, I have held a wide variety of roles and titles. Tennis writer. Angels beat reporter. Olympics writer. Essayist. Sports media critic. NFL columnist. Recent keeper of the Morning Briefing flame.

Today I leave for a few weeks' vacation, and when I return, I will come back in yet another incarnation.

As Christine.

I am a transsexual sportswriter. It has taken more than 40 years, a million tears and hundreds of hours of soul-wrenching therapy for me to work up the courage to type those words. I realize many readers and colleagues and friends will be shocked to read them.

That's OK. I understand that I am not the only one in transition as I move from Mike to Christine. Everyone who knows me and my work will be transitioning as well. That will take time. And that's all right. To borrow a piece of well-worn sports parlance, we will take it one day at a time.

Transsexualism is a complicated and widely misunderstood medical condition. It is a natural occurrence — unusual, no question, but natural.

Recent studies have shown that such physiological factors as genetics and hormonal fluctuations during pregnancy can significantly affect how our brains are "wired" at birth.

As extensive therapy and testing have confirmed, my brain was wired female.

A transgender friend provided the best and simplest explanation I have heard: We are born with this, we fight it as long as we can, and in the end it wins.

I gave it as good a fight as I possibly could. I went more than 40 hard rounds with it. Eventually, though, you realize you are only fighting yourself and your happiness and your mental health — a no-win situation any way you look at it.

When you reach the point when one gender causes heartache and unbearable discomfort, and the other brings more joy and fulfillment than you ever imagined possible, it shouldn't take two tons of bricks to fall in order to know what to do.

It didn't with me.

With me, all it took was 1.99 tons.

For more years than I care to count, I was scared to death over the prospect of writing a story such as this one. It was the most frightening of all the towering mountains of fear I somehow had to confront and struggle to scale.

How do you go about sharing your most important truth, one you spent a lifetime trying to keep deeply buried, to a world that has grown familiar and comfortable with your façade?

To a world whose knowledge of transsexuals usually begins and ends with Jerry Springer's exploitation circus?

Painfully and reluctantly, I began the coming-out process a few months ago. To my everlasting amazement, friends and colleagues almost universally have been supportive and encouraging, often breaking the tension with good-natured doses of humor.

When I told my boss Randy Harvey, he leaned back in his chair, looked through his office window to scan the newsroom and mused, "Well, no one can ever say we don't have diversity on this staff."

When I told Robert, the soccer-loving lad from Wales who cuts my hair, why I wanted to start growing my hair out, he had to take a seat, blink hard a few times and ask, "Does this mean you don't like football anymore, Mike?"

No, I had to assure him, I still love soccer. I will continue to watch it. I hope to continue to coach it.

My days of playing in men's over-30 rec leagues, however, could be numbered.

When I told Eric, who has played sweeper behind my plodding stopper for more than a decade, he brightly suggested, "Well, you're still good for co-ed!"

I broke the news to Tim by beginning, "Are you familiar with the movie 'Transamerica'?" Tim nodded. "Well, welcome to my life," I said.

Tim seemed more perplexed than most as I nervously launched into my story.

Finally, he had to explain, "I thought you said 'Trainspotting.' I thought you were going to tell me you're a heroin addict."

People have asked if transitioning will affect my writing. And if so, how?

All I can say at this point is that I am now happier, more focused and more energized when I sit behind a keyboard. The wicked writer's block that used to reach up and torture me at some of the worst possible times imaginable has disappeared.

My therapist says this is what happens when a transsexual finally "integrates" and the ever-present white noise in the background dissipates.

That should come as good news to my editors: far fewer blown deadlines.

So now we all will take a short break between bylines. "Mike Penner" is out, "Christine Daniels" soon will be taking its place.

From here, it feels like a big improvement. I hope with time you will agree.

This could be the beginning of a beautiful relationship.

Sunday, April 08, 2007 6:25 PM

Current mood:  optimistic
Category: Life
Frustrated Coach Kyle Hawkins had nowhere else to turn.

Alone with his secret, the college lacrosse coach sat down at his computer seeking others like himself: gay men who played and coached competitive, high-level sports but remained trapped in the closet.

"I am totally closeted, not married, totally gay and no one would guess," he wrote in an online chat room for gay athletes, coaches and fans. "My family, my team, my university and my career are not even remotely gay-friendly."

Over the next two years, Frustrated Coach revealed his hopes, fears and secrets with his trusted, but similarly anonymous peers on Outsports.com.

The 33-year-old coach shared his regrets about pursuing "serial one-night stands" with strangers as he grappled with his identity.

He disclosed a recent bout with colon cancer. His upbringing in a fundamentalist Baptist church that scorned homosexuality. The emotional void he felt in hiding. How a psychologist urged him to date women to make sure he was truly gay. Alcohol binges he sought to dull the pain. The 24-hour involuntary commitment on suicide watch in a psychiatric hospital.

Gradually, the coach grew more comfortable in his own skin. On Halloween 2004, he told his parents, both devout Baptists and the children of missionaries.

The coach's parents were devastated. So were his older brother and sister. The family's youngest child was a sinner, an abomination in the eyes of God. Communication stopped.

Frustrated Coach returned to his computer, gaining more confidence even as his family shunned him. Over the ensuing 18 months, he began to confide his secret to a select group of friends - but no one connected to lacrosse.

On June 10, 2006, Frustrated Coach again logged on to Outsports . This time, he signed his online post using his real name:

Kyle Hawkins. Head coach, University of Missouri men's lacrosse.

---

The practice fields at the Mizzou lacrosse summer camp were a stew of sweat, testosterone, juvenile humor and adolescent chest-thumping.

"What are you, some kind of fag?" one camper said to another who messed up a drill.

"Get off me, you have AIDS!" another shouted to a chorus of teenage laughter.

Hawkins remained silent. He knew that these were high school students, with all the immaturity that entails. He also knew the locker room's unforgiving culture, and that anti-gay insults are common in team sports, from junior high hallways to NFL stadiums.

At the camp, Hawkins revealed his secret to some ex-players working as assistants, and a few returning players, team leaders with compassion and sensitivity.

Still, when the entire team returned to school in September, he kept quiet.

"If you're treating it as special, you're still not treating it as equal," Hawkins said. "If I sit my kids down and say, 'Let's talk about my sexuality' ... What straight coach does that?"

The players knew anyway. There were whispers he'd been seen at one of the few gay bars in the town. Then some reporters trolling the Web saw his Outsports posts and sought out Hawkins when Chicago White Sox manager Ozzie Guillen called a reporter "a fag."

The online lacrosse community began its own debate. Among the questions: Should a gay coach be allowed in the same locker room as his straight players?

For the team, Hawkins' status as the only openly gay men's coach of a major college sport became the two-ton elephant in the room.

Everyone knew, but no one was talking.

"It's awkward," said Blaine Skrainka, a junior attackman and the team's vice president.

The Tigers' lacrosse program is a club sport; players buy their own equipment and uniforms and pay annual dues of nearly $2,000. But while the team lacks varsity status, the players are just as committed. They practice five days a week and must abide by NCAA rules, from grade requirements to mandatory study halls on road trips.

"Everybody who plays on our team loves lacrosse," said sophomore attackman Charles Nagel. "They love the sport enough where they're not going to quit just because the coach is gay."

Still, a dozen key players, including the team's star goalie and co-captain, didn't return to the team this season.

None cited Hawkins' sexuality as the reason they left. They said they wanted to devote more time to school or internships, or they complained of the financial burden or a lack of playing time or personality conflicts with Hawkins.

One former player wrote derogatory comments about Hawkins on Facebook, the social networking Web site. The coach attributed the outburst to immaturity and alcohol, not hatred.

He acknowledged, though, that the number of players who left is higher this year.

"They're young people and they have an issue with me," he said - whether the issue is his sexual orientation or something else.

Sophomore Sam Fosdick said he quit the team after chafing under Hawkins' leadership. "I left because of a disagreement with the coach," he said. "His being gay had nothing to do with it."

---

Hawkins grew up in a St. Louis suburb, in a household so strict he was forbidden to cross the street alone or play cards and games of chance.

He was the good kid, the one who found acceptance in his church youth group - even as he struggled with a reality he wouldn't acknowledge for years.

He maintained the charade at Arizona State University, where he was president of a Baptist student group. Summers were spent as a missionary back in Missouri.

His eyes opened to the possibilities beyond a life devoted to the church on a 1991 mission trip to Russia. He learned Russian and watched the fall of communism.

Back in St. Louis after college, he lived with his parents and taught high school history.

No one knew the first thing about lacrosse, and the school needed a coach for its new team. Hawkins, passingly familiar with the sport, got the job. Four years later, he was recruited by Missouri to steady a program in disarray.

He relied on his teaching skills as a coach; he took pride as a communicator, even as he hid his personal life. And he was successful: In his first eight years, his teams compiled a record of 112-49, including a conference championship in 2004.

But that all happened before he came out of the closet. What would happen now?

Hawkins knew that he would be watched: "If I grab a kid on the sidelines and have a hand on his shoulder and point with the other hand at the field, which hand is he worried about?"

University leaders vowed to stand behind him, citing a school non-discrimination policy that includes sexual identity. But his first season as the nation's first openly gay male coach on the collegiate level was not an easy one.

Oct. 14: Time was running out in the first quarter of a game against archrival Kansas. Hawkins and the opposing coach sought more time on the clock from the referee.

"We don't care what faggots think," the official said.

He then compared gay men to child molesters.

Hawkins didn't hear the insult - but others did, and told him afterward.

The coach was outraged. He quickly complained to the Great Rivers Lacrosse Conference's commissioner and head of officials.

The referee sent an apologetic e-mail to Hawkins, calling the matter a botched joke. He was suspended for at least one year - a punishment that won't affect his other job, coaching a local high school's freshmen.

The slur and variations on it have been something of a theme. In September, at a game at Illinois, Hawkins heard a fan call him a fag. And at one practice, a member of his own team referred to the Fighting Ilini as faggots; his teammates glared.

It's all "a learning experience" for his players, says Hawkins.

When a player asked Hawkins to volunteer at a fraternity blood drive, the coach replied that sexually active gay men aren't allowed to donate blood, because there was too great a risk that the sample could be contaminated with HIV.

The player's response - a mixture of compassion, curiosity and outrage at what he perceived as an injustice - heartened Hawkins. It also made him angry.

"Why weren't you asking those kinds of questions before you knew I was gay?" the coach thought to himself.

---

In October 2006, the NCAA hosted a meeting related to gays in college sports. Among the topics: "negative recruiting," in which coaches urge prospects to reject a rival school because its coach is gay.

Hawkins worries about negative recruiting. But the most visible change for the gay coach trying to convince adolescents to play for him is a surprising one: Missouri has become a magnet for gay high school lacrosse players.

Three such athletes have already committed to Missouri next year. The connection makes Hawkins uncomfortable. "If you're gonna make a decision based on a coach, make a decision based on the coach's coaching ability," he said.

He doesn't want those players to assume they'll receive preferential treatment simply because they're playing for a gay coach.

"If there are a couple of kids who are shortsighted enough to make a decision to come here because of my sexuality, there are bound to be a couple of kids who have decided not to come here (because I'm gay)," he said. "That's just as shortsighted and stupid."

So life outside of the closet is still complicated, though in different ways. And regardless, Hawkins says, life is better. At 36, Hawkins is in his first committed relationship, dating a man for the past six months. The two spent the Christmas holidays in Ireland.

And he insists that disclosing his true identity has made him a better coach. Keeping the secret took its toll, and kept his mind off the playing field.

"Instead of being able to focus on lacrosse, I focused a significant amount of (energy) worrying about who thinks I am gay, who knows I am, who will react poorly if they find out, who will not," he said. "I don't think about those things anymore."

©365Gay.com 2007

Currently listening:
We Are Pilots
By Shiny Toy Guns
Release date: 17 October, 2006
Thursday, March 22, 2007 3:57 PM

Category: Life

From: GQ, February 2007

Ali Hili is a gay Iraqi whose government forced him to spy on other homosexuals. Now, after a daring escape from his home country, Hili is doing everything he can to make up for the past.
By David France

*****


Ali Hili tears through the extravagant mass of CDs that line the walls of his messy home office and fill every horizontal surface with corkscrews of jewel boxes. He collects rare recordings of diva vocalists, from Aretha Franklin to Edith Piaf, but he's looking for something by his favorite, Dalida, the Franco-Arab sensation known for her emotional lyrics and tragic life. Like other singers of a certain pathos, Dalida enjoyed a huge gay following throughout the Middle East and especially in Baghdad in the 1990s, when Hili worked as a DJ in gay-friendly clubs at the Palestine Hotel and the luxurious al-Rashid Hotel.

"Gay men are really, really into her in Iraq," he says with great animation. "She's very icon."

He finds the disc he has in mind, but before he can play it, his cell phone rings, and he checks the caller ID and quickly snaps the phone to his ear. Hili, who is 34 years old and ruggedly handsome, doesn't say much beyond a few greetings in Arabic. And then he kind of moans, and tears soon form in his eyes. "It is Hussain," he finally whispers to me, "the Baghdad correspondent for our group." (The names of some Iraqis have been changed to protect them or their families.)

Hili's group is a loose network of Iraqi exiles and their supporters called Iraqi LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender). From a crowded office in London, they work to protect gays still inside Iraq, where for more than a year, in the midst of the waves of chaotic violence, an especially brutal campaign has been waged specifically against homosexuals. Hili has received hundreds of reports of attacks and has evidence that over forty have been killed, most at the hands of men in Interior Ministry police uniforms.
Some of the dead are people he knows from the clubs. One of the first victims, a 40-year-old transsexual named Haider "Dina" Faiek, was one of Hili's oldest friends. She was beaten by uniformed officers who doused her with gasoline. Witnesses said observers were cheering as she burned to death. "She was one of my first gay friends," Hili tells me, shaking his head. "I really loved her."

Searching the Internet for more news about her slaying, Hili discovered information about a second and third victim, both men he knew from the clubs. Then he found the unifying thread: Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, the single most powerful religious figure in Iraq today—a man the Bush administration plays up as a partner in peace and many have promoted for a Nobel Peace Prize—had posted a fatwa against gays on his Web site in October 2005. According to a translation, people "involved" in homosexuality "should be killed in the worst, most severe way possible." It went unnoticed by most of the world. But Sistani is the spiritual leader of the Shia Muslim majority, especially followers of the main Islamic fundamentalist group called the Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq, whose armed militants in the Badr Organization have infiltrated the Interior Ministry police force. The Badr Organization is reportedly responsible for many of the antigay executions.

Hili crafted a press release about the fatwa and received some minor media attention. Quietly, last May, the death decree was altered slightly, though not completely withdrawn, and the killings have not stopped. Since speaking out, Hili has received several death threats, including an anonymous e-mail a few days before I arrived at his apartment that read: The street is always watching you Ali…

So he takes what precautions he can. He seldom travels alone through London at night and has frequently changed SIM cards in his cell phone, making it difficult to trace him or his overseas contacts. And he uses a nom de guerre even among friends. He says he chose "Ali" in memory of his first love in high school, who was killed by a land mine in the aftermath of the Iraq-Iran war. "Hili" comes from a famous Iraqi pop singer from the '70s named Sadi Hili, a Middle Eastern Engelbert Humperdinck whose deep, romantic voice and hypermasculine style has spawned countless jokes concerning his presumed homosexuality.

In September 2005, Hili formed his group to help generate political pressure to stop the killings. But given the chaos and fatal violence gripping all of Iraq, their efforts have seemed a bit frivolous to some. So, working over cell phones and the Internet, Hili and his comrades have been forced to set up a vast underground railroad with collaborators in many Iraqi cities and in countries throughout the Middle East and Europe. And they established sixteen safe houses within Iraq, where they shelter gays and transsexuals who can't hide their sexual orientation and are in imminent danger. Some have been hiding this way since 2004, often in tightly curtained rooms, unable to leave. A network of supporters and "correspondents" deliver food to them and see to their medical needs, then pass status reports up through channels that ultimately reach Hili, who scribbles the updates into his records.

At the end of his conversation with Hussain, Hili wipes his eyes and hands me the phone. "He speaks a little English," he says. "He wants to talk to you."

"If you want a story, I will tell you," Hussain begins breathlessly, without introduction. He sounds very young, though he is 32, and his voice is full of fear and anger. "This is my best friend. They killed him. I want to tell you a true story."

Hussain explains that he is in charge of monitoring safe houses in the northern city of Sulaymaniyah, where several men have been hidden by a local family in exchange for rent money. One of them was a blond transgendered woman named Emad. Until the troubles began, Hussain and Emad had been roommates, but for the past few months Emad had been on the run, sure he was targeted for execution. When Hussain arrived there earlier in the day, he learned that Emad had been killed three days before. He weeps with rage as he describes the condition of the body, which showed signs that they killed him by running him over with a car. His corpse was left alongside the road, and passersby openly debated if he was a man or a woman. A friend—another gay man—went to study the corpse after hearing the chatter; he confirmed the identity to the victim's family.

"I got very devastated," Hussain tells me frantically. "They said informers in the community reported him. His family didn't hold a funeral ceremony for him, because they didn't want anyone to know that he was killed because he was gay." After a series of shallow breaths, he adds, "I am worried. I'm sweating all the time, fearing that something might happen to me while I'm doing what I'm doing."

When he hangs up the phone, Hili puts the notes he made in a pile under a teacup, unsure if anybody will care about Emad's passing. "We're a community helping each other, with a little outside help," he says. "Just like the Jews at the Nazi time."

*****

When he was 19, Ali Hili, the elder son of a professor and a housewife, was studying English literature at the University of Baghdad and working nights in a record store. He quickly earned a reputation for his knowledge of rare and esoteric European and American recordings, and the few foreigners in Iraq back then often came into the shop to talk with him. Among them was a 30-year-old man I'll call Ivan, an Eastern European posted to his embassy in Baghdad. Hili does not want anything written about Ivan that might expose his identity. He is married to a woman and still in government service.

The two met when Ivan asked the clerk for assistance, and a flirtation ensued. They soon began an affair, and before long Hili was in love. When Ivan promised to leave his wife, Hili believed him.

He also believed that nobody knew about their affair. But that delusion ended one afternoon late in 1992. An officer in Saddam Hussein's legendary intelligence service, the Mukhabarat, contacted a cousin of Hili's who worked for the Iraqi General Security Service, another branch of the spy apparatus. Without explanation, the officer asked the cousin to put together a meeting with the teenager.

On the appointed day, Hili, his cousin, and Hili's father stood outside the Cinema al-Adhamiya, in a bustling Baghdad shopping district, waiting for a late-model blue Mitsubishi. When it arrived, driven by a lone Iraqi intelligence officer, they piled in.
"He was very relaxed, very nice—very gentle," Hili tells me over tea one afternoon. "He introduced himself to my father and said, 'We think your son is someone good, and we need him to do something for his country. He's very intelligent, very smart, well-presenting, speaks very good language, and he has very good communication skills. We're proud of him. We want to have him helping and working with us.' Of course, my father can't ask—my cousin even can't ask—what type of mission. It's unnegotiatable. Then he said to me, 'I need to see you in a few days.' We said good-bye and drove home. And I remember my father said to me, 'Listen, no matter what they say, just say yes. They pull a gun and want to shoot you, say yes. Don't ever negotiate or discuss or question or say no.' "

At subsequent meetings, the intelligence officer told Hili he knew about his sexual orientation. He gave Hili an ultimatum: Either cooperate with Iraqi intelligence or they would reveal his secret. Hili didn't fear prosecution. Under Hussein at the time, homosexuality per se was not illegal, but he was afraid that his family and neighbors might learn the truth. Iraq is a tribal society where homosexuality is regarded with extreme disdain. Honor killings were not uncommon.

Hili's assignment was to begin spying on his lover. Hili never learned why, and he never received any money for these services. He simply did as his father instructed and agreed to the intelligence officer's demands.

"He was my partner. He was my lover. He was my friend. He was my brother. He was everything to me. I didn't want to betray him. But if I don't, I lose my family. For almost a year, I did what I had to do. I used to write everything we used to do, me and Ivan, and everything I observed him doing. If he takes a spoon," says Hili, lifting a spoon from the saucer of his teacup in his apartment and examining it between his pinched fingers, "and washes it and puts it on the floor"—his pantomime continues—"that's what we need. How he does things: how he walks, how he stands, how he sits, whatever he does! What's his favorite drink? How does he like his food? How much salt? All those little details I have to put in writing and hand it to the Iraqi intelligence."

One day Ivan announced that his wife was pregnant, startling news that Hili took as infidelity despite the fact that he was betraying Ivan with every report that he wrote.

Through the year, his assignments grew more convoluted. On several occasions, Hili says, he was instructed to make compromising audiotapes of himself and his lover. One night he was told to lure Ivan and one of Ivan's coworkers to an apartment where the bedroom was wired with video-recording equipment. Two women were assigned to accompany them, the goal being to produce blackmail tapes in whatever sexual pairings Hili could direct.

But as the evening wore on, Hili says, Ivan's coworker showed no interest in sex, and Ivan, perhaps worried about his sexuality being revealed, flirted openly with one of the women, even going so far as to pull her into the bathroom momentarily while the video equipment cranked away in the empty bedroom.

Hili's handlers went berserk. They blamed him for thwarting the plan. "I went to hell after that." Hili says he was thrown into a detention center called Murkaz Tadeib Wa Thabat, which translates as Center for Control and Rehabilitation, a division controlled by the notoriously cruel Qusay Hussein.

Hili has given conflicting accounts of how long he stayed there—three weeks or three months—and his descriptions of harsh treatment he experienced while detained are generally vague and sometimes seem improbable. In one account, he reported being hog-tied and hung up for days, and in another he said his eyes were doused in acid, though he shows none of the lasting damage that either torture technique would necessarily leave. In another he said he was raped with objects so large he required hospitalization for the extensive damage to his rectum. Officials at the Iraqi embassy in Washington aren't able to confirm Hili's allegations of torture. In fact, I was unable to confirm anything about Hili's intelligence work. "As the country collapsed, records went all kinds of places," says Noah Feldman, who, as a constitutional adviser to the occupying authority after the U.S. invasion, interviewed Hussein's alleged torture victims. But Hili's story is not unusual, he says. "Many, many people were informants for the Mukhabarat in one capacity or another, without choosing to do so and without being paid."

Hili's lawyer, a top asylum solicitor in London named Wesley Gryk, attributes the contradictions to a commonplace tendency among refugees to blur and exaggerate, made worse by an imprecise command of English. "They think, 'No matter how bad the situation was that I fled from, I'd better make it sound worse.' Whereas my job is to say, when I feel the client is putting too many eggs in the cake, 'I don't believe this, and the Home Office won't believe it. The truth is good enough—you don't have to bolster it.' "

The truth, says Gryk, is that Hili was detained and tortured, that he was hog-tied and put in stress positions for hours at a time, repeatedly, over a number of days, and sprayed with a substance like pepper spray or tear gas that caused him great pain but no lasting damage. Medical tests confirm debilitating anal scarring, whether it happened during the first detention or the second. "He was treated very badly, there is no question about it," Gryk tells me. "But as far as what happened on day one, what happened on day two? Some people aren't good at that kind of detail. He is better at recalling emotions."

Upon being released, Hili saw Ivan only once more, in a chance meeting in the lobby of the al-Rashid Hotel, where Ivan and his wife and baby had been dining with family friends. They spoke briefly and formally, Hili recalls. Ivan announced he was being transferred to another country, leaving almost immediately, then whispered in Hili's ear, in English: "I know you had to do what you had to do."

"I couldn't warn you!" Hili remembers replying. "I would lose my life and my parents!"

"I don't blame you," Ivan said, before rejoining his party. He shook the young man's hand. "I was selfish, too. I chose my family, and I let you down. Everyone chose his own ways."
I tried confirming this exchange with Ivan. A Google search showed he was posted to an embassy in the West, but when I called there, I was told I had missed him by just a few days. "He and his wife left last week," a receptionist told me. She could not provide a forwarding number. "They are traveling and will eventually return to [their home country]," she said.

*****

Ivan's departure didn't free Ali Hili from the obligations of his intelligence handlers. Instead, he says, he was given an ever expanding list of targets to befriend, embassies to visit, sexual idiosyncrasies to exploit. As the months and years went by, he set himself up as a stereophonics expert, advertising his services to the diplomatic community so he could befriend well- connected foreigners for the government. He also hired himself out as a party planner and compiled dossiers on his clients, which included a diplomatic-wives' association, as well as on visitors to the clubs where he DJ'd and to the TV station where he produced a talk show. He dwelled on detailing their sexual appetites, which his handlers found useful. Hili had become extremely deft at soliciting these details, he says; people showed a ready willingness to confide in the handsome, ingratiating, and soft-spoken young man.

Soon the intelligence service, in an apparent sign of faith in his abilities, established and stocked a record store in one of Baghdad's most exclusive shopping districts. He says the government gave him a new name and identity when they put him in charge of the shop, but again no salary. Hili put the place on the map immediately. Diplomats traveled from across the Middle East to shop there. He made friends easily and filed nightly surveillance reports with every detail.

Except one. One oven-hot day in June, Hili was swimming with a friend at the posh al-Rashid Hotel when an older European man approached him. Not wanting to give away his nationality, I will call him X. "I became aware of his sexual interest in me when he touched me immediately under the water in the pool," Hili wrote last year in his asylum petition to the British government's Home Office. Knowing it was wrong, he invited X back to the shuttered record shop for some after-hours sex in the back room.

I was able to track down X, who is currently living in Africa. Though pleading for anonymity because he is closeted, X confirmed every detail Hili provided of their decade-old tryst, including its irrelevance. "I went to the record store with him, in the back room," he tells me, "and it was all over very quickly."

Why didn't Hili put this in his report? To this day, he's not sure. "I let down my guard. Sorry to say it, I thought he was just a shag, nothing more. It was a mistake. It was a big mistake."

Either Hili was under surveillance, or X's every movement was being observed, or else X himself was filing diaries to the Iraqi authorities. There is no other way to explain what Hili says happened next. Several days after their meeting, Hili was confronted by his handlers. "How about X?" they demanded. "You never said a word about X."

Again he was sent to the catacombs beneath the Center for Control and Rehabilitation, he says, this time for months. Repeatedly, he was forced to write out the specifics of his brief encounters with X, what was murmured, promised, and confided—the times of day, the people they passed, the things they overheard or should have overheard, detail upon detail of the few short minutes that made up their time together. He describes these interrogations as being almost unendurable. He remembers other aspects of his detention in shallow splashes of data. A broken nose (a scar shows on his bridge), sleep deprivation, prolonged standing in coffinlike rooms, prolonged squatting inside hot metal boxes, a searing pain radiating from his core: "They burned me—from inside my anus. They inserted a hot metal object inside me, and they damaged it," he tells me softly, as if describing a botched dental procedure.

Gryk, Hili's lawyer, says his client was just an ordinary gay man and that they used that fact to turn him into a spy. "They put him in a position of compromising other gay and bisexual men. And then they punished him cruelly for not being especially good at it."

*****

It is almost impossible for Hili to urinate. Opening his urethral muscles, which were also damaged during torture, requires hot compresses and extreme concentration. Extensive scar tissue keeps him from having ordinary bowel function and has left him with erectile dysfunction. Two botched surgeries in Baghdad failed to give him much relief. For that he blames the U.N. sanctions, which had left the country's infrastructure in tatters and starved its medical establishment.

Though he had little money and was still serving as a reluctant intelligence agent, he hired a succession of smugglers to move him across the border, but they took his money and never returned. Finally, in 1999, he managed to get a tourist visa to Turkey, and with nowhere else to go, he headed there, traveling by car to the northern border.

Along the way, he made a stop at the office of X, whom he had not seen since his detention two years before. (Hili did not tell me about this visit; X brought it up when I called him.) Hili, he said, appealed to him for help getting refugee status. "I remember, when I saw him, I was very surprised, and when he asked for help, I was even more surprised," X says. He admits he rushed Hili from his office, denying him the assistance he sought. "It was very dangerous for both of us for him to be there," he says.

When I explained that Hili had been detained and injured as a consequence of their meetings, X expressed shock, then grief. "Oh, the poor guy," he said, loudly fumbling to light a cigarette. "Poor people, poor people, poor people."

Hili was amazed when I recounted this to him. "He admitted we'd had sex?" he asked. "He admitted he turned me down? I can't believe it." He sat in silence on the telephone for a time. "I was convinced that day that he was with the Iraqi intelligence. He made me feel like shit. He said, 'You can't stay here. You have to leave now.' I walked out of the office, and I didn't return."

He drove immediately to the Turkish border, he remembers. But guards there arrested him on charges of traveling with falsified documents. The forged passport he was using didn't fool them, and they turned Hili over to the Iraqi army, where he says he would serve a seven-to-ten-year sentence if convicted. He pleaded with army officials to turn him over to intelligence, hoping they'd give him a break.

They did. According to each asylum claim he has filed with Britain, Hili says he negotiated his release by agreeing to carry out an espionage mission in Dubai, the principal port city in the United Arab Emirates. His assignment was to infiltrate an Iraq-based holding company there, Al-Najah Trading, and report back on the personal habits of the president and the business practices of his various deputies. In Dubai, he would become a world-class spy, however unwilling.

*****

Al-Najah is a major shipping concern headquartered in Baghdad, with satellite offices in a half-dozen Middle Eastern ports as well as in Pakistan. The company's subsidiaries offer a wide range of services, including bodyguards and industrial-construction teams, petroleum goods and equipment, agricultural supplies, crude oil, and research-grade chemical and biological compounds. The Dubai offices comprise a number of floors in a nondescript office tower.

Ali Hili went about his business at Al-Najah, shadowing one of the managers through the streets and reporting his findings once or twice a week at an apartment Iraqi intelligence had secretly rented outside the city. He befriended an Iraqi who worked at the company and regularly found excuses to visit him at work, where he could take note of the activities inside. Once, he managed to pocket his friend's office key, which he copied. Thereafter he snuck into the building on nights and weekends, coming and going with surprising ease. He rifled fax in-boxes and read company e-mails, photocopying whatever he found, regardless of content. He was never quite sure what to focus on.

Eventually, Hili says, his superiors would direct him to look around for specific documents or correspondences carrying certain signatures or insignia. "I started to see lots of money moving between Dubai and India, Dubai and China, and other transfers through Hong Kong, Singapore, the U.S., and Canada," he says. "That's what they started becoming more interested in. They tried to get someone in the bank who could give them all the bank-transfer details. They would have paid any amount of money to hack into those bank details."

As before, they were paying Hili nothing for his work. So he once again sought legitimate employment to pay his bills, arranging a clerk position at a place called the Music Box. He also began to establish a personal life, setting up in a simple apartment and making friends. But he never forgot for a moment that he was an undercover Iraqi agent. He says, "They approached me wherever I was—on the bus, at dinner—always to let me know they were watching me."

Then, on the evening of September 21, 2000, he locked eyes with a tall blond businessman from Texas named Spencer Lockhart. The setting was Jules, a popular club at the Meridien hotel known as one of the few places in the Emirates where gay men can meet one another. Lockhart, who at 39 was eleven years older than Hili, had been directed there by a discreet concierge at the hotel where he was staying. As vice president for a Houston-based company recruiting foreign-born nurses for U.S. hospitals, he had traveled all over the developing world, becoming something of a connoisseur of gay cultural outcroppings like Jules.

"It was very nice, the place," Lockhart tells me in an interview in Houston. "They had a typical Filipino floor show. The lead singer was a Filipino male who was extremely effeminate, quite amusing to the audience." He remembers the crowd included men and women from all over the world, plus an assortment of female Eastern European prostitutes. But a sizable minority were gay men. "At first it was low-key, and as the night advanced, it became more apparent," he says. "Slight eye glances, occasional smiles, maybe a wink or somebody offering to buy you a cocktail, that sort of thing."

He first spotted Hili sitting alone at a long table and immediately took note of his striking looks and sullenness. Lockhart, an imposingly large man, is quite shy, particularly in such situations. "I was thinner then and a lot blonder," he recalls, "but I never did well with Anglos particularly." He waited for Hili to say hello, then fell into an unexpectedly intense exchange about everything from music to gay life to personal goals. They retired to Lockhart's room, where they spent the night. Lockhart said he had no expectation of starting a relationship, but over the next two months, as he traveled through Asia and the Middle East, they talked every day by telephone. By early 2001, realizing he had an opportunity to make Dubai the base for his world travels, Lockhart proposed they take an apartment together.

That's when Hili confided about his history with the intelligence service and his current duties as Saddam Hussein's spy in Dubai. "I just kind of looked at him and thought to myself, 'My God, how could you of all people, who seemed so nice and easy, get into this sort of thing?' I always knew he was running from something, but I never knew what it was. I thought, 'Maybe he's not right in the head.' " But in time, the story made sense to him; it surely explained the melancholy that surrounded Hili, his quickness to anger, and the myriad physical problems he tried to disguise.

As Hili recalls it, Lockhart had an odd response to the revelation. "He said, 'You have to leave this,' " Hili says, eyes widening at the surprising simplicity of the idea. "He told me to walk away."

Lockhart recalls it similarly. "I felt this was unlike any other thing that I had been challenged with in my life," he wrote in an affidavit to the British authorities. "I advised Hili that if we were going to move forward as a couple, that he had to find a way to get out of the al-Mukhabarat. I explained to him that I would do anything I could do to help."

With Lockhart by his side, Hili decided to end his unpaid career in espionage. He stopped visiting the Al-Najah plant to pillage desks or the Iraqi embassy to give his lengthy reports. He left his job at the Music Box, vacated his old apartment, changed his mobile phone, and abandoned his usual routines. For most of 2001, even after the September 11 terror attacks on America and Washington's growing conviction that Saddam Hussein had something to do with them, life seemed uneventful.

*****

In early February 2002, Lockhart traveled to Amman, Jordan, on an extended recruiting mission with a colleague, retired lieutenant colonel James R. Broyles, the company's president for education and nursing. It was not uncommon for them to spend three months in a country, since prospective candidates needed extensive training and testing before they were hired, followed by rigorous bureaucratic efforts on their behalf to attain green cards for them and travel documents for their families.

But a few weeks into the trip, Lockhart fell ill with kidney stones and spent a week in a local hospital. When he returned to his hotel room, he found it had been ransacked and that his in-room safe was emptied. He lost calling cards, travel documents, and an expensive ring. The intruders had even searched his laptop computer. Lockhart was startled to see that it had been turned on. When he complained to management, the response struck him as suspicious, Lockhart says. "They just said, 'That couldn't have happened.' It was really weird."

Lockhart and Broyles changed hotels, but weird things continued happening. An anonymous e-mail appeared in Lockhart's in-box giving details of his appointments, where he'd taken meals, what he'd eaten. "Apparently, somebody was following me, keeping track of me, and sort of waiting for the opportunity to do something," he says. "You don't know how terrifying it is to realize you're being studied."

The same information was e-mailed to Hili back in Dubai. But Hili already knew that their period of calm had come to an end. As he was leaving a record store one afternoon, Iraqi intelligence agents accosted him angrily. Thereafter, his e-mail in-box filled first with letters demanding he return to Baghdad, which he ignored, then notes incorporating transcripts of his phone conversations with Lockhart. Hili and Lockhart replaced the SIM cards in their cell phones, changed numbers, even canceled old e-mail addresses, but the transcripts kept coming no matter what they did. Then, clandestine photographs arrived, making it clear that Lockhart and his colleague were being followed. The two immediately packed and fled the country, abandoning a class of sixty nurses, most of whom had already been hired by a large U.S. hospital chain, costing the company a small fortune.

"The only time I was really scared, the only time I felt 100 percent vulnerable in my life, was [that day] in the airport," Broyles, a veteran of the first Gulf War, tells me over the phone from Manila, where I found him entertaining clients at a dinner party. "I was terrified. I felt this was really escalating out of control, and if I didn't get out of this crazy place, maybe something horrible would happen."

Things only got worse. A typical message came on June 16, 2002, from the e-mail address am_kiler@hotmail.com, with a grisly photograph of a beheading: "THIS COLD HABBENS FOR YOU AND YOUR IRAQI MATHER FACKER SOON, AND ALL HIS FAMILY, IF HE NO LISTEN FOR US AND SURENDER TO HIS GOVERMENT." On June 19, with another attached photo, came this: "MATHER FACKER, YOU THINKING BECASE YOU SWICH EMAIL ADRESS WE WILL NOT FEGER IT OUT?" Then, on the twenty-fifth: "TIME NOW IS ALL IN OUR HANDS."

"We were terrified," Lockhart says. "We decided we needed to get some help."

Back in the States, Lockhart's brother Jerry called to ask his senator to intervene. He says his call was referred to the new Homeland Security office, then to the FBI, then to the CIA. Ultimately, an agent flew to Dubai.

In anticipation of the meeting, Hili says he planned one last visit to the Al-Najah offices. He hoped he might find something there that would impress the Americans, who were engaged in a public search for evidence of weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.
One weeknight after 7 p.m., Hili says, he sat in his car in the garage below Al-Najah's offices and called upstairs to see if the porter had gone for the night. Nobody answered. He repeated this precaution five times before taking the elevator to the tenth floor. He let himself in with the key he'd used before, then moved quickly to the fax room. There he found two faxes from a Chinese company called QILU, a company the Iraqis had seemed very curious about in the past. He folded copies of both documents into his pocket. Before leaving, he also took copies of appointment calendars, e-mail addresses, and bank logs.

He says he brought these things with him to the CIA meeting at the U.S. embassy. The meeting did not begin particularly well. "They thought he was a little crazy," Lockhart remembers, "just like I did at first." But when he presented his purloined documents, their interest was piqued. The two faxes turned out to add little to the debate, though, and the meeting apparently never improved; they were not offered protection from their harassers, which was their main request.

Hili says a CIA agent, whose name he does not recall, proposed using Hili in the larger propaganda campaign for the pending war. "They told me to lie. They said, 'We're going to hand you over maps, photos, data—information you say you brought to us, and we are going to help you tell about this to the world,' " he says. He told them no. "I said, 'I can't lie about my country. I can't stand against it with a lie. I won't be part of causing other people's death.' They said, 'Stop and think about it. Take your time. It's your chance to get a great life, a wonderful life. You'll be safe for the rest of your life.' "

Had Lockhart and Hili been a heterosexual couple, they might have ended their dilemma by getting married, which would have given them protection in the United States. Or had Lockhart been British or from any European Union country—from one of the nineteen nations that consider same-sex relationships when granting immigrant status—their relationship might have allowed them to find security.

Through a friend Lockhart met at church in Dubai, the two tried appealing to British authorities. But before it could happen, another e-mail arrived, warning Lockhart against cooperating with the English. The anonymous writer promised him $10,000 to deliver Hili to Jordan and turn him over there. "They were trying to be nice, saying my safety would be guaranteed and he would receive a fair trial. I was dumbfounded by that whole thing. We decided to make a run for it."

*****

Surreptitiously, they began to plan a dash for London. Lockhart, who had by now told his whole dire story to his employer, would be able to work out of his company's offices there. If Hili could make it into the country, he might have a chance with an asylum claim. "Even if they held him in some English facility while he sought asylum, I knew at least he would be safe," Lockhart says.

But British authorities denied Hili a tourist visa; so did most other embassies, fearful that Iraqi nationals were unlikely to return home with war drums sounding. Only Turkey was still welcoming Iraqi tourists. Hili secured a short-term visa, but Turkey would be a dead end, a place where gays are no less reviled and where the intelligence agents were likely to find them. In frustration, the two began driving to outlying consulates, presenting themselves as a quiet gay couple in need of a holiday. Luckily, in Abu Dhabi they sat across from a Belgian civil servant who, if he wasn't a romantic, was at least a tad greedy. "I told him we had been together for a couple years and were looking forward to a vacation," Lockhart recalls. "I think I handed him 4,000 or 5,000 dirhams. It was a big risk. He just looked at us. Then he said, 'Come back in four hours.' "

Each received what is called a Benelux stamp in his passport, allowing travel to Belgium, the Netherlands, and Luxembourg. From there, they hoped, they might figure out another way into England. But landing in Europe first added new challenges. Under European Union law, an asylum seeker must make his declaration in the first country he enters. To stay together, Hili had to reach English soil without being stopped.

Locally, they told friends they were planning a vacation to Amsterdam. Hili had the names and numbers of human smugglers he believed would help get him from there to Britain. They boarded a plane to Turkey on September 27, 2002, with all their paperwork in order, leaving behind everything they owned. The Turkey layover was meant to be a precaution; they felt a brief visit was necessary for explaining why Hili had a Turkish visa in his passport. But going there had the opposite effect. Turkish authorities, alarmed by something in Hili's travel papers, detained him, refused him entry, and packed him onto a return flight to Dubai. In Dubai, the two turned around to try again. They had little choice—their tickets to Amsterdam originated in Istanbul.

This time, though, they decided to await their connecting flight right in the airport, avoiding passport control. They begged a ramp agent with Emirates Airlines to let them into the locked VIP lounge overnight. Perhaps he saw the desperation in the eyes of the mismatched gay couple. He let them in and hid them behind a partition, where they spent the night, unable to sleep.

Boarding the plane for Europe the following morning was the most anxiety-provoking moment in Hili's life, he says. "When you have had this much adrenaline in your blood, you get used to it. I knew how to manage it, but that day I had a pounding heartbeat. Not butterflies—I had dinosaurs inside me. I knew it was my way to freedom."

Hours later, when they latched their hotel-room door in Amsterdam, finally alone in the relative freedom of the West, the weight of their ordeal got the better of them. They collapsed into each other's arms and wept. "It was a pretty incredible moment in our life, making that little passage," Lockhart says. "It doesn't sound like much, but it was a lot."

*****

Hili looked up the smugglers he'd been told about. One man, a family friend from Hili's old neighborhood in Baghdad, introduced him to a pair who sold him a Dutch passport with a picture of a man with dark features like Hili's. The cost was about $8,000, plus more for an escort through customs. But at the airport, Hili was detained for passing false documents; Lockhart and the escort were somehow shuffled onto the plane and forced to make the trip to London without Hili. Before taking off, Lockhart called Hili's cell

"I didn't know what was happening," says Lockhart. "I sat down on the plane and broke down in tears. When I landed in London, I talked to the [escort] guy, and he shrugged his shoulders and said, 'Well, he didn't get through.' And he walked off and disappeared. We never saw him again."

The police didn't keep Hili. Lockhart visited when work permitted, but for the most part, Hili was now on his own in Amsterdam, awaiting resolution of his case. He spent the time trying to figure another route to London. One smuggler he met agreed to help provide authentic travel papers, but the minute Lockhart paid his fee, 2,000 euros, he demanded 1,500 more.

By now Lockhart's bank accounts had run dry. Making matters worse, in November his mother took ill in Houston. He ran his credit cards to their limits in order to visit her in the hospital. To make ends meet, Hili says he started scouring flea markets for rare records and CDs, reselling them to local shops for small profits. Soon, though, he was forced to give up his hotel room and sleep under a bridge for a number of snowy winter nights. He contemplated suicide.

Out of loneliness, Hili answered a personal ad posted by a gay couple looking for companionship. A 41-year-old dermatologist named Jean Philippe de Bliek and his partner, Edwin Dadema, 48, didn't demand sex. Instead, they offered him a drink and a shower. Hili described his efforts to buy passage to London. "We liked him immediately," Dadema told me when I tracked him down in Amsterdam recently. "That can happen in one second if someone is simpatico and it clicks." Eventually, they invited Hili to stay in an apartment they owned, along with a number of other gay men they'd met in similar circumstances.

Then, before dropping him off for the night, they stopped at their bank and withdrew 1,500 euros for him, a huge sum of money to be giving to a stranger. But Dadema tells me they'd done it before and since; they are collectors of people, especially young gay men who are passing through in their journey to freedom, of which there are no shortage in Amsterdam, which has become a major stopover on the gay underground railroad. Martin Manalansan IV, author of Global Divas, a book about the gay diaspora, says an astonishing and underreported wave of gay migration is under way. "There are massive groups of avowed, quite visible, self-identified gays and lesbians moving around the globe today, searching for freedom," he says.

"We're not overloaded with money, but to share is nice," Dadema tells me. "We always say, Some people cross your road, and that's not for nothing; if you can help, you help."

Hili was flabbergasted. "People like this, they deserve a Nobel Prize—though that is not why they do it," he says. "I know I would not have survived without them."

Immediately, he made contact with the smuggler and passed along the money, but Hili's luck was not holding out. The smuggler took the money and ran.

*****

By December 2002, Hili and Lockhart's financial situation had grown perilous; now Lockhart was borrowing money from his employer and relatives, pouring whatever he had into keeping Hili from starving in Amsterdam while keeping an apartment in London and frequently flying home to be with his mother. Rather than trying to buy more false documents, they decided to try boarding the Eurostar train to London without any papers whatsoever. Someone had told them that customs agents don't pass through the cars until the train has entered British territory.

Late in November, they took the train from Amsterdam to Brussels without incident, then bought tickets there for London. But a customs agent demanded their IDs before allowing them on the train, something they hadn't anticipated. Hili was refused passage, and for a period of time the agent detained him for questioning.

Whether out of pure greed or greed limned with compassion, Hili says, the agent didn't arrest him. Instead, he offered to look the other way if Hili could meet his price, another 1,500 euros. Hili agreed, and while Lockhart went on to London, Hili returned to Amsterdam to raise the money and await the agent's phone call announcing what day this could happen. Once again, his Dutch saviors helped him. "This was the last trip on his journey to freedom," Edwin Dadema remembers thinking, "and that was worth a lot of money, of course."

They all harbored doubts that the agent would ever call Hili again, but he surprised them. "Remember me?" he said in heavily accented English. "From Belgium?"

He instructed Hili to meet him in Brussels. There he handed Hili a British driver's license. "There are two colleagues always at the booth," he said, according to Hili. "Hand me this. I'll look at it. Smile. Don't be nervous, don't be grim. Normal smile. Show it to me. I'll look at it and give it back to you. Then you go to the waiting area. When you get in, you watch me. When I go to the bathroom, hand me an envelope. Hand me the money in an envelope and the driver's license."

Hili arrived at the train station in the early afternoon, as instructed, with no identification except for the driver's license. He sat on a bench with his eyes on the agent's darkened window, cranking up the music on his Discman: from Dalida's Boxed Collection Number Five, his favorite. At three thirty, he saw the light flicker on and was relieved to see his contact's silhouette. Hili fell into line at the window, not anxiously first nor stubbornly last. His training as a spy steeled his nerves.

"When it came to me to give him the card, I smiled normally," Hili says. "I gave him the card, he looked at it, handed it back to me, and said thank you." It was that easy. Hili advanced to the waiting area as instructed, and in ten minutes or so the clerk—Hili never learned his name—spun away from the window, excused himself to his colleagues, and left the booth. Hili's eyes followed the back of his head, down the hallway and left into the men's room, with the same disinterest he'd practiced as a Baghdad intelligence agent, then removed his headphones, zippered them into his travel bag, and headed to the restroom himself.

Inside, the agent was drying his hands. Hili turned on the water and began to wash. The place seemed otherwise empty, he remembers. After drying his own hands, Hili handed over the envelope and the driver's license. The agent smiled.

And then he did something that startled the breath out of Hili: He grabbed him by the shoulders, yanked him forward, and kissed him hard on the lips.

"I hope I see you in London," he said.

It wasn't until the train began boarding that Hili felt his journey was reaching an end. So he was surprised when a terror overcame him. When he heard the all-aboard call, his legs went numb. Pushing himself to his feet, he headed for the platform as though wading through wet concrete. "I thought, 'I just need to go behind these doors—I can see the train!' I was moving very slowly. It takes—I'm telling you—an iron man to act this way: to be cool, calm, unobvious. I tried to pressure myself not to show any kind of abnormal behavior. Police were everywhere, looking at everyone. I heard a rumor that UK immigration people were on that train. I said, I have to try this time anyway."

He took a seat and placed his bag at his side. The ride was swift, under three hours, and he spent the time removing anything in his possession that might suggest where he'd been recently: Even the SIM card in his cell phone might lead British authorities to discover that he'd spent time in Holland.

It was early evening when the train slowed at the Waterloo station. Hili let the crowds thin before approaching a small cluster of officers on the platform. He was shaking. "Okay," he began, "I'm here to apply for asylum."

"Fucking hell," one of the officers said.

Hili says he was taken to a police station, fingerprinted and photographed, then returned to the train station to be sent back to Belgium. "This is not unusual," says Steven Watt, a Scottish human-rights attorney now working for the ACLU. "Arab-looking men are being denied entry by countries all over the world because some low-level officers think they might be potential terrorists." An officer put him on a seat inside the last door on the train, then stood guard at the door awaiting departure. He remembers the other passengers staring; they seemed afraid of him, he thought. He remembers glancing out the open door at the platform he'd longed to touch.

"I thought, 'That is England. I came and I lost it.' "

He pulled a belt from his bag and ran out the door, knocking the police officer aside. He jumped onto the platform and knotted the belt around his neck. "I'm killing myself," he screamed hysterically, over and over. "I won't go back to Iraq."

Somehow, making a scene made all the difference. He was presented with a formal petition and was released in the morning, temporarily free in Waterloo till a hearing could be arranged. His first call was to his Dutch benefactors—Lockhart was in Houston—and they were so excited for their new friend that they jumped on an airplane and took Hili to his first big dinner in England that night.

*****

Hili's first asylum application contained several inconsistencies. He said he'd traveled from France, not Belgium, and used as his name the one his Mukhabarat handlers had assigned him, changing his parents' names to match his. He infused his torture narration with obvious hyperbole, claiming every imaginable assault on his eyes, anus, penis, and testicles. It might have been enough to say he'd been manipulated because of his sexuality and left physically handicapped. But he wasn't confident. "I didn't want to be rejected," he admits. "Spencer and I went over this many times, what I should put in. We thought this was the best way to get asylum."

It backfired. A year and a half ago, the British Home Office denied his claim, calling it "vague," "contradictory," and illogical, and concluding that it failed the smell test: His alleged time in detention was unusually short by Iraqi standards, and his torture descriptions matched Hollywood action movies more than accepted descriptions from inside Hussein's feared prisons. The rejection even went on to cast doubt on Hili's relationship with Lockhart, citing inconsistencies regarding the dates of their first meeting and where they lived.

Besides, it said, the world Hili described ceased to exist the minute U.S. and British troops overthrew Saddam Hussein in April 2003. The totalitarian regime, the Home Office wrote, "has completely collapsed, its security apparatus dissolved, and senior officials banned from office. It is no longer a threat either to the Iraqi people or the wider world."

Hili's lawyer, Wesley Gryk, wasn't surprised at all. Gryk joined the case after Hili had made his claim without representation. He filed an appeal, and through oftentimes angry exchanges, he admits, he forced Hili to pare down his story to its bare facts—some of which contradict what he and his partner said in their earlier filing and conflict with what they've said to me. I suppose it could be that Hili, who was forced for a decade to chronicle every mundane detail of his life in daily intelligence briefings, has developed an aversion to tidy fact sets. People who survive great privations tend to attribute lasting personality traits to their experiences. Slavery's wounds have lasted generations. Surely being made to spy on your own lover could twist a man's mind.

Or maybe he chose forgetting over forgiving and as a mechanism for survival has willfully lost track of the details. Of course, he could simply be lying. Even his attorney seems unsure of the veracity of Hili's long story. But he says it shouldn't matter. International law should simply concern itself with the love between Hili and Lockhart, the way it automatically provides deference to heterosexual unions. "They're an amazingly devoted couple," he says. "From day one, it was obviously a case that had to be won, because it was 110 percent clear there was no way they could live together as a couple in Iraq, where no gay relationship would be tolerated. And lastly, Spencer is American and Jewish. They had a right to be able to live their life together. For me that was the core of the case, whether or not he was held upside down for two days or had acid thrown in his eyes."
His instinct was correct. In a lengthy determination dated August 19, 2005, an appellate immigration judge again rejected the veracity of Hili's long story of woe but concluded that separating Lockhart and Hili would entail a "hardship beyond description." On humanitarian grounds, the court granted Hili a three-year leave to remain in the UK, renewable for another three years.

*****

At least for now, his journey out of Baghdad seemed to have a happy ending, and Hili celebrated with calls to his old friends back home. One of them delivered the tragic news about Haider "Dina" Faiek's execution, on a busy Baghdad street as she headed to a party. "Do you know what happened to Dina? They burned her alive," the friend said. Hili was stunned. The two had been friends for fifteen years. Faiek, who worked in the prostitution industry as a transsexual madam, was a fixture in Baghdad gay circles, always loud and fun and quick with a laugh. She never hid her orientation and indeed lived openly as a woman.

Apparently, though, she first came to the attention of religious opponents in early 2004. She was sufficiently scared for her life that she sought out the U.S. command there and asked for travel papers so she could flee the country. I spoke to Ibaa Alawi, the Iraqi translator for something called the Civil Military Assistance Center, established by American forces to help ordinary Iraqis navigate the transition away from tyranny. He says Faiek came into the office and begged for protection.

"The major I worked for told me that he cannot do anything for Haider," Alawi says.

That was Major Jack Nales, an army reservist who has since returned to his civilian job as executive director of the American Red Cross in Fayetteville, North Carolina. Reached by phone there, he says he recalls the case and confirms Faiek was sent away without the protection she requested. "At that time, there were not a lot of systems in place to provide assistance," he admits.

According to reports, Faiek left her house to attend a party one night in the fall of 2005. The attackers wore police uniforms identifying them as members of the Interior Ministry, but on their heads were black knit ski masks. They beat Faiek for some time before setting her on fire. After she was dead, her attackers ripped at her body, then moved her to the side of the road, making her look like just another bomb victim.

The awful news had barely set in when Hili heard about an attack in the southern provinces. A former employee of Hili's was visiting a friend when a hand grenade exploded on the friend's lawn, sending shrapnel through the windows and embedding it in their faces. When he learned of the attack, Hili called him immediately, he says. "I asked him if he was all right, and he said there was a second assault, and a third."

The employee, a 31-year-old called Ahmed, told Hili that the assailants had not given up. They returned to hunt down Ahmed's friend a few days later, shooting him dead in his home, execution-style. Then they came looking for Ahmed. They found him one day later as he was entering the local gym with his boyfriend. They opened fire. Ahmed reached the bathroom and hid there; his boyfriend was killed.

"He was terrified," Hili remembers. "He knew he needed to get out of there." There were fewer and fewer places left for him to hide in Iraq. (The sixteen safe houses that Hili's group had maintained had eventually been reduced to three.) Hili gave Ahmed's story to journalist Doug Ireland, an American blogger; then he and Lockhart sent Ahmed $400 to help him flee the country. He made it to Amman safely.

But more reports kept coming in: Two teenagers were killed, reportedly for working as gay prostitutes; an actor was holed up with five others in an impromptu shelter; another transgendered woman was assassinated; a lesbian couple from Najaf were slain. Then came news that Ibaa Alawi, the Iraqi translator for American forces, had become a target himself. He received ominous letters at his new position, as a program director at the British embassy in Baghdad: They cited passages from the Koran and promised death to homosexuals. As he was driving home a few days later, a car pulled up behind him, and someone inside it opened fire. Thereafter, he only left the house he shared with his parents and younger sister to do essential errands.

Once, assailants surrounded the house and lobbed a hand grenade onto the lawn. Luckily, no one was home. "The neighbors told us there were armed men wearing police uniforms, covering their heads with these black covers," Alawi tells me by phone. He left the yard immediately and never returned; after a brief stopover in the United Arab Emirates, he flew on to London, using his British connections to gain a visa. Upon arrival, he filed for asylum. "I lost everything," he says. "I left a perfect job, a luxurious life, a good home, and my whole family. I had no choice."

As with Ali Hili, Alawi's claim to the Home Office was declined, he says. "They said, in terms of returning to Iraq, 'If you return there, you would face discrimination, not persecution.' That's silly. The death which we see every day is persecution." He remembers what Prime Minister Tony Blair said to him one day when he toured England's Baghdad Embassy: "We are indebted to your services, and we realize when you come here every day you're at risk."

"The point is," Alawi goes on, "now Iraq turned from a liberal state to a typical extremist Muslim state. Now you would see that if you walk in the streets of Baghdad, it's absolutely scary. And there's no place for gays there now."

*****

Last November, Alawi won his appeal, Hili told me in a bubbly e-mail. For a brief moment, he had something to celebrate. But it did not last. Within days, as Hili spoke over an Internet telephone to a clandestine gathering of his Baghdad colleagues, he heard a commotion, then lost the connection. The meeting, it turns out, had been raided, and the men—ages 19 to 29—were detained. They have not been heard from since.

"I'm afraid," Hili tells me in a voice worn thin with exhaustion and fear. "I have a feeling they're killed. I hope I'm wrong, but that's what happens in most of the cases. That's what they do in Iraq."

David France, a former Newsweek senior editor, is the author of Our Fathers. His most recent book is The Confession, written with James E. McGreevey.

Tuesday, February 20, 2007 4:06 AM

By Mandi

 

I knew when I offered to write this piece, that information on Oklahoma Gay History would be limited, however, I didn't realize exactly how limited it would actually be.  For one thing, compared to other places in the country, the concept of gay liberation is a fairly new phenomenon.  While the rest of the United States saw their fight for equality kick off with the Stonewall riots in 1969, Oklahoma didn't get started until 1979, a full 10 years after the most recognized and referenced incident to gay rights.  I guess this would explain why we seem to be so behind in our efforts in comparison to other places.

The first major gay rights organization to form in Oklahoma City, Oklahomans for Human Rights (OHR), was established in 1979.  Almost immediately, Tulsa wanted in on the action and formed its own chapter.  The group was organized by attorney Bill Rogers and was aimed at professionals.  As many of you may have noticed, ..:namespace prefix = v ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" />..:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />..:namespace prefix = w ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" /> there is no mention of the word "gay" or "queer" or anything else that would tip outsiders to the fact that this was, in fact, a gay rights organization.  The reason being that, at the time, many were either afraid or simply would not be associated with any group using these references in their names.  OHR was key in getting a queer community center established, The Oasis Gay Community Center, which opened its doors in October of 1983.  Of coarse, now it is simply known as "The Center".  OHR eventually dispersed, however, the Tulsa branch is still going strong and has recently help establish a Gay and Lesbian history center and museum in Tulsa.

        The first ever gay pride parade was held in June 1988 in the same 39th St. area.  The theme for that year was "Rightfully Proud in '88" and march organizers chose representatives from local AIDS support groups to act as grand marshals.  Surprisingly, the parade went off with virtually no hitch, despite rumors that the Ku Klux Klan would show up in protest.  In fact, the only protesters to show up were relatively small in numbers and were mostly from local churches. 

        There have been a number of other groups to form since our meager beginnings in the early 80's, many of whom are still active today.  The Oklahoma Gay and Lesbian Political Caucus (OGLPC) is one, as well as Herland Sister Resources.  While we would, in no way shape or form, ever want to belittle what these groups have done in the past to further queer rights in our community, I would argue that there is an awful lot of complacency among our community today and I am genuinely worried about the future of the movement.  Freedom does not come free and it is well past time for us to stand up for ourselves and do something about the social climate we are now facing.  We are up against a strong and vocal opposition and until we start to speak just as loud, we will never be heard. 

Sunday, February 11, 2007 2:36 AM

 

I'm sure that by now most of you have probably heard about all of the uproar caused by the recent snickers commercial aired during the super bowl on Sunday.  The ad features two men working under the hood of a car that end up accidentally kissing when one cannot resist the chocolatey goodness being enjoyed by the other.  It ends with one saying "do something manly" and then both of them ripping out some chest hair.  Apparently, this add has been deemed "offensive and homophobic" by prominent queer organizations including GLAAD and the HRC.  So, you may be asking yourselves, what is our very own local organization's stance on this issue.  Well here it is, like it or not:


We at TQR think that this issue is totally ridiculous and a complete waste of time.  Our "community leaders", as much as I love them, take themselves WAY TOO SERIOUSLY.  If anything, I think we should be looking at this as a step forward…a very very small step forward, but forward nonetheless. Think of it this way, 10 years ago…hell 5 years ago, it would have been out of the question for an ad that features a man on man kiss (especially during the manliest of all sporting events), regardless of the context.  At least this, in some small way, puts the issue more into the mainstream.  Plus, sorry 'bout it GLAAD and HRC, but the commercial was damn funny.  I know I got a good laugh out of it.  So how about this.  How about we stop getting our panties in a twist about every little thing that MIGHT be construed as an attack on the queer community, especially, when that is CLEARLY not the intent, and focus on REAL issues such as equality under the law?  Advertising is not about political correctness, it's about appealing to a certain audience in order that they might be persuaded to purchase a product, and I give Snickers kudos for the add, as THAT is exactly what they have done.


Saturday, February 03, 2007 2:10 PM
By Mandi ..> ..>..>

So, I'm sitting at work today, as I usually do on a weekday, when all of the sudden, I find myself in the middle of a gay marriage "discussion" with the old ladies.  Now, generally when I'm at work, I try to avoid this conversation.  Not because I'm scared to speak up, just because of the nature of this state and the general consensus among most people on this issue COULD cause some problems for me at work and I really need the pay check so I try to keep my mouth shut…but once it turned to "the sanctity of marriage" thing that straight Christian people always fall back on, I had to speak up.

It just kills me how sanctimonious and hypocritical people are.  How are straight people going to look at us and point fingers and say that we will destroy the "sanctity of marriage" when THEY are the ones setting records with their 50% divorce rate?  What does that say about how 50% of the married couples in this country feel about the sanctity of this institution?   But they don't want to look at those facts and I learned today that apparently this counter-argument holds no water with people.  I just don't understand what the big freaking deal is.  If something comes on TV that I don't like, I simply change the channel.  So, if you have a problem with gay marriage, then don't marry one asshole!  And don't come to our weddings, we don't want you there anyway!  I do have to confess, though, that a part of me understands where those people are coming from with all the religious implications that come along with "marriage".  It just makes no sense to me that state governments can deny us, not only that aspect of it, but they can also deny us all of the legal and financial aspects of marriage as well.  See to me, the institution of marriage is a two tier thing.  You've got the religious side of it, but there are a lot of legal and financial benefits that come along with it as well.  Why can't I put my girlfriend or partner or whatever you want to call it on my insurance.  Why can't we file taxes together?  Why can't my doctor tell her what is happening when I flat line in surgery?  Why can't I die with the piece of mind that whomever I leave behind will be secure because they will get my life insurance money and will inherit anything else I might have, like everyone else that builds a life with another person is entitled to do?  And why are states trying to pass legislation that now says…not only can you NOT get married here, but you can't get married ANYWHERE that allows it.  Excuse me for saying so sirs…but where in the FUCK do you get off telling me ANYTHING about what I can do, with whom, and where!  This is a BLANTANT violation of my constitutional rights as a tax paying citizen of the good old United States of America.  Maybe that's the answer to our problems.  Money talks, right, so maybe we should all just stop paying taxes until we are afforded the same rights that everyone else in this country is privy to.  After all, why should we continue to pay for government institutions that have no regard for us or our interests?

But all of that, if I'm being completely honest, this isn't even the most frightening violation of civil liberties going on right now in this country.  I genuinely believe that if people don't start paying attention to what the hell is going on, soon enough, there will be no more civil liberties in the US, period.  There will be no religious freedom (which is the whole reason we ended up here in the first place!).  There will be no freedom of speech, no freedom of the press (two liberties that I contend are almost gone anyway).  And if I'm being totally honest, I'm not convinced that at some point, we won't find ourselves locked away in camps with others that the WASP population deems "inferior".  Now that I think about it, they've already begun that process.  Anyone remember a little place called Guantanimo Bay?  We don't hear much about that these days.  Am I the only one who wonders why?  Sure, if you're a white gay man named Joe Smith, they probably aren't looking to lock you away at this point, but if you're a brown man who happens to be a practicing Muslim and your name is Mohammed Jihad, you better watch your back.  And they get a way with it everyday.  Why?  Because of national security?  My ass!  So, the question is, when are the rest of us who are identified as a subculture on the outskirts of society going to be deemed a "national security issue"?  Keep your eyes closed America.  It's just a matter of time.  



 
Friday, October 27, 2006 5:30 AM

Current mood:prideful
(from 365gay.com)
_____________________________________________

Color has long played an important role in our communities' history and expression of pride. In Victorian England, for example, the color green was associated with homosexuality. The color purple (or, more accurately, lavender) became popularized for the lesbian and gay communities with "Purple Power". And, of course there are the pink and black triangles. The pink triangle was first used by Hitler to identify gay males in Nazi concentration camps, and the black triangle was similarly used to identify lesbians and others deemed "asocial". The pink and black triangle symbols were reclaimed by our communities in the early 1980s to signify our strength of spirit and willingness to survive oppression. As we gain acceptance of our rights, the symbols of oppression are gradually being replaced by the symbols of celebration. By far the most colorful of our symbols is the Rainbow flag, and its rainbow of colors - red, orange, yellow, green, blue, and purple, which represent the diversity of our communities.

The first rainbow flag was designed in 1978 by Gilbert Baker, a San Francisco artist, in response to calls by activists for a symbol for the community. Baker used the five-striped "Flag of the Race" as his inspiration, and designed a flag with eight stripes: pink, red, orange, yellow, green, blue, indigo, and violet. These colors were intended to represent respectively: sexuality, life, healing, sun, nature, art, harmony, and spirit. Baker dyed and sewed the material for the first flag himself - reminiscent of Betsy Ross and the creation of the US Flag.

When Baker approached a company to mass-produce the flags, he found out that "hot pink" was not commercially available. The flag was then reduced to seven stripes.

In November 1978, San Francisco's lesbian, gay and bisexual community was stunned when the city's first openly gay supervisor, Harvey Milk, was assassinated. Wanting to demonstrate the gay community's strength and solidarity in the aftermath of the tragedy, the Pride Committee decided to use Baker's flag. The indigo stripe was eliminated so that the colors could be divided evenly along the parade route - three colours on one side and three on the other. Soon the six colors were incorporated into a six-striped version that became popularized and that, today is recognized by the International Congress of Flag Makers.

The flag has become an international symbol of pride and the diversity our communities.

 

WHAT THE RAINBOW FLAG SIGNIFIES

A symbol of pride

The rainbow flag, symbol of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered pride. Pride at having not only survived, but thrived in a world which has often been a hostile place. It is pride in being who we are, it is pride in becoming a full and equal citizen of Canada, it is pride in standing up for what we believe in.

A symbol of hope

In addition to being the symbol of pride, the rainbow is a symbol of hope. Tremendous progress has been made in the fight for equal rights. Step by step, lesbians, gays, bisexuals and transgendered people are obtaining recognition as equal members of Canadian society, in big cities and in towns and villages across Canada. Our anti-gay opponents are becoming frustrated because their hate cannot defeat our love. Things are not perfect, but the progress we are making is extraordinary...and the rainbow affirms our hopes for an even better future.

A symbol of diversity

Finally, the rainbow is a symbol of diversity. Although myths and stereotypes portray all gays and lesbians as having a single, monolithic "agenda", the reality is that ours is an extraordinarily diverse community. Across all races and cultural backgrounds, across all languages, with or without disabilities, across all religions, our communities continue to flourish. Sometimes, our own communities are divided between gay and lesbian, between "gay" and "queer", between those in big cities and those in the suburbs and small towns, between "assimilationists" and those who want to live apart from the mainstream. While diversity poses its challenges, it is also enriching. There are as many opinions as there are people. There is no lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgendered "lifestyle", there are only lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgendered people. Millions of us, each one unique. This is our strength.

So, why should we bother?

  • Because the government will not allow us to marry the person of our choice;
  • Because people are still denied jobs, promotions or denied accommodation because of their sexual orientation;
  • Because gay teenagers are disproportionately at risk of suicide;
  • Because Canadians are still beaten or murdered for being lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgendered;
  • Because we are still made to feel uncomfortable when holding the hand of a partner while walking down the street;
  • Because our materials are still censored by the government and banned from schools;
  • Because our relationships remain unrecognized in hundreds of federal, provincial and territorial laws.

BY CELEBRATING PRIDE TOGETHER, WE REMEMBER OUR PAST, AFFIRM OUR FUTURE AND PROVIDE IMPORTANT VISIBILITY WHICH ADVANCES OUR STRUGGLE FOR EQUALITY.

Currently listening:
We Are Family
By Sister Sledge
Release date: 20 June, 1995
Monday, October 16, 2006 2:26 AM

Current mood:  ecstatic
Hello Revolutionaries!!
As many of you already know, October 11 was National Coming Out Day. In celebration, we asked you to come post your own coming out stories in hopes it would help others find the strength to also come out of the closet. We have re-posted your stories below. Thank you to everyone who shared their story, we are truly grateful for your courage and willingness to share.
We love you all,
TQR

____________________________________________________
I cAn Be YoUr GrEaStEsT mIsTaKe :
10/11/2006 2:04 AM

so i just told my parents i was lesbian and they didnt believe me for shit and this was lik 4 years ago well i got diagnosed with cancer and all that and my best friend stayed with me well she told my parents about my gf and they were lik so u are lesbian i was lik duuuude if i didnt have to barf right now i would so argue with u... there still kinda in denial even when they walk in on me and my chick

____________________________________________________
Allen :
10/11/2006 2:12 AM

I am so much happier since I have came out. I have accepted the fact that I am gay since I was 19, and came out to everyone, except my father(redneck)when I was 21. The only thing I regret is not being able to tell my mother before she passed away. I am very open about my sexuality and am very Proud.

____________________________________________________
Taylor :
10/11/2006 2:47 AM

I am am now 23 and came out to my family when I was 19. The funniest thing I remember about the whole ordeal was my mother asking me if it was just a phase, my step dad asking if I was gonna be a Will or a Jack, and my grandmother telling me she would have asked me a long time ago if it would have made me feel any better.... lmao

____________________________________________________
:[ Brandie ]: :
10/11/2006 12:02 PM

I came out to my mom when I was 15, we've always been close and by that time, I had already been with one guy.. and I hated it.. She said she had always had a feeling that I was a lesbian. I came out to my dad when I was 16, and found out that he is bisexual. My sister was the first person I came out to, and she was fine with it, and gave me the strength to stand up for my sexuality and not be scared. All of my friends know that I dont like guys, but its still the same 'Let me introduce you to this friend of mine, She's totally your type!'
Lol

____________________________________________________
i'm bringing bitchy back :
10/11/2006 12:26 PM

i came out to my mom when i was 18. we were driving on campus after a musical theatre performance (fitting, huh?) and i just blurted it out: "mom, uhh, i'm gay." she simply nodded, smiled and said "well, i think i've known longer than you have!!" i guess all of those times i wore dresses as a kid tipped her off. i wish she would have told me when she realized it ... it would have made my life SO much easier!!!

____________________________________________________
Sawah :
10/11/2006 12:38 PM

I'm scared of the dark so the closet was never a good place to be for me... Happy Coming Out Day - COME OUT COME OUT WHEREVER YOU ARE!

____________________________________________________
Audiacio :
10/11/2006 1:02 PM

Firstly, Love the new look!
I was 23 when I came out. The first person I told was my girlfriend at the time (I know, I was one of those) what a terrible way to start. We were together 5 years and were best friends beforehand. Then I told my best friend Mike and then my sisters (not my brothers). Shortly after I left for college and just never told my parents, because when I was growing up they had always said I would be disowned. I guess that was just a scare tactic, because that soo did not end up being the case. In fact, they were very supportive. My dad had said at the time "I don't care. You are the only one of my boys to try to make something of his life." They may not ask a lot of questions now, but I am thankful to to still have them in my lives. XO

____________________________________________________
Jason :
10/11/2006 1:16 PM

My coming out story is long, twisty and sordid...but I'll give the short version. I grew up in a very conservative Baptist family, so when I decided to come out at 17, I was very afraid of my family's reaction, so I wrote a long coming out letter to my mom, left it where she'd find it, packed some things and went into hiding at my Dad's (the only person that wasn't conservative). Any way, it was all very dramatic: my family made me come home, my mother was devastated, the family all rallied behind her and tried to convince me I was making a horrible mistake. Christian counseling ensued, I rebelled. To make a long story short, after all the hubub subsided, my family slowly started to accept me as I was. I've never regretted coming out and I am now able to bring my partner over for holidays or whenever I want and we are both accepted and loved. My mom has totally changed her perspective on the issue and the rest of the family deals with it, too. All in all, a pretty happy ending.

____________________________________________________
Taren :
10/11/2006 1:48 PM

I think Ive always been "out". Its important. It shows the public that we are real.

____________________________________________________
*~Stevee~* :
10/11/2006 1:57 PM

lets see.... my coming out to my mom took place approximately 2 days after i decided to get a divorce from my husband. lol. i just kinda said hey mom i'm seeing this girl named....
as far as to my dad..well my ex husband told him while he was packing his shit he yelled in a fit of rage "its not my fault your daughters a lesbian" after the ex had left and all had calmed my dad said "so Stevee you're gay?" lol i said dad we'll talk later! but thats about it. it was accepted from the get go w/ my parents cuz my sister is gay and i have an uncle that is and i knew they had been accepted so why not me! :)
happy coming out day to all!!!

____________________________________________________
Douglas :
10/11/2006 2:11 PM

I had come out to my best friend by showing her the movie "Get Real". We cried and laughed and all was gay in the world. A week later, while eating a bowl of cereal, my mom chastised me for going to prom with a black girl. I was arguing with her about how racist that was when she said "Well, I'd rather you date a black girl than a man" I said, "well, what if i wanted to" It didn't take her long to find out i was serious. It took her a few months, but she grew to understand. Now, she is the most amazing! Happy Coming out Day

____________________________________________________
Bendingo :
10/11/2006 2:13 PM

Lets see... I came out at the age of 18 to my best friends, Kelly and BJ. I told Kelly in the middle of rush hour at the coffee shop we were working at. It was an hour later until I heard her reaction. lol! And BJ some how already knew. So it wasn't a big shock to him. It was a year later that my family found out though. I was doing a senior report on gay marriage the night before it was due. My mother found it the next morning still up on the computer screen. She came to my room as I was getting ready for school. "Ben?... Are you gay?". I couldn't lie anymore. "Yes" I said. Then she asked me if I was going out with this guy I was hanging out with all the time. "yes", I said. And that was that. It was weird, I thought my mother was going to blow up on me. But she did tell every live SOUL that I was gay! No one really cared though. Even my grandmother said she still loved me. She didn't approve, but she still loved me.

So, I guess my coming out wasn't as dramatic as I thought it would be...

~Benji

____________________________________________________
Robby :
10/11/2006 7:01 PM

Aside from it being a rather long and somewhat convoluted story, the short (being a relative term) version is as follows.

It was the summer when I was back from my first year away at college. I wasn't really looking for a realtionship, much less a summer romance. My life was just fine, thank you. I was living with two guys in San Antonio who quickly became my family and my "family". I didn't think I needed any one other than my brothers. Little did I know.

It was on one of those lovely, and rare, Oklahoma nights where the sky had the feel of black velvet sprinkled with diamonds with a light breeze blowing out of the West. There was an all night restaurant nearby that was the semi-official hangout for the bohemian element in Tulsa. Since nothing was happening I decided to walk to the restaurant and see who was there and what was shaking. I knew most of the people from high school and felt right at home.

Just as I got comfortable at the end seat of the booth I was told to turn around and meet a new member of the group by the name of Johnny. Actually, his name was John E. but everyone pronounced it Johnny. Right from that moment we both knew that there was something going between us - chemistry if you will. We became good friends quickly and within no time he asked me to move in with him, a request to which I readily assented - with absolute quickness.

We had been living together for a couple of weeks when John suggested having a quiet dinner for a few friends of his so he could introduce me properly. I could go for that, provided it was a small group. On the evening of the dinner we drove to a local club that had a large, private meeting room and food. We were ushered into the meeting room where some fifty or sixty people were sitting around tables awaiting our entrance. John made sure that I got an introduction to everyone, though I couldn't remember name one at the time. I was almost phoebic about it all.

After dinner the waiters brought in trays of champaigne glasses and handed one to each guest. John then stood up and proceeded to introduce me as his one true love of his life and that we were a couple. I was looking for a crack in the floor to crawl in to. This was totally unexpected. Everyone applauded the announcement and were most welcoming. Even so I had the feeling I had just been "outed" by my love.

A couple of weeks later, after I had gotten over my mad about the dinner, John said we needed to get out of the house and go see what was happening at the all night restaurant. Seemed like a good idea to me.

On the way to the restaurant John proceeded to inform me that it was now my turn to do the honors if asked. Once more I was petrified but with John at my side I figured he would save me if I made too big an ass of myself.

When we entered the restraunt we were greeted by a large number of friends sitting at the usual table in the back of the restaurant. We joined them and room was made for us to sit down. I let John scoot in to the booth first and sat on the end. I was never a nervous as I was at that moment.

And if prompted, one of the people at the table opened the conversation with, "Haven't seen much of you two lately. Where you been?" Before John or I could answer another friend noted that she had heard I was living with John and if that was so where was I sleeping, since John lived in a one bedroom duplex.

I instantly grabbed John's leg, shutting off any blood circulation to his foot. My response was that I slept in the bed of my love. At first there was a table full of people with deer in the headlights looks. When the reality sank in everyone congratulated us and went about business as if nothing had happend.

There it is in a nutshell. I was outed by my love and then came out shortly thereafter. Both experiences were nowhere near the horror stories I had hear from others. I suppose I'm one of the fortunate ones. Everyone has been supportive and understanding, even when I wasn't.

____________________________________________________
lesbian mom :
10/11/2006 7:43 PM

My Coming Out Story::: Okay kids gather around Mommas gonna tell you a story. Once upon a time I was married to this man who was okay with my being "bisexual". He would let me sleep with women and thought it was rather cool that I enjoyed the strip bars and such. It about 7 years ago I started going to this little known place called "Partners"....maybe youve heard of it?? :)) anyhoo, I was becoming more comfortable in the environment and realized that who I found attractive was evolving. Suddenly the super femme girls were not what I wanted sexually. Dont get me wrong, I enjoy the view of a hot Femme as much as the next Lesbian. However, I locked eyes and *ahem* a few other things with the person I was destined to spend my life with. I never thought everything any me could feel so complete. Every void and nagging since of somethings missing was just gone. I found my perfect cmbination of masculinity and feminity in Carrie. So, I struggled within myself for a few months on whether to walk away from all that society deemed acceptable to follow My Happiness. 4 months after meeting her I was divorced, lost several freinds and family and happier than I had ever imagined I could be. Fuck everybody that cant accept me for who I am. Who I am intimate with does not define me. The hardest was to my children. My boys were 5 and 9 at the time and I waited until Carrie and I were at the point we had decided to commit for the long haul ( not U-haul, 2nd date) but the LONG haul. We have been together for 6 years now, had a baby who is now 2 and we are still very much in love!! I wouldnt trade my life for anything!

____________________________________________________
!!!CARMEN!!! :
10/11/2006 10:35 PM

The first time I had ever heard the word lesbian and what it meant was when I was 7. my older sis had explained to me that the reason why I was always kissing the neighbor girls(and not the boys) was because I was a lesbian. It all made sense to me. I have never felt any real attraction to boys, not ever, ive been a little curious but that's about it. Anyways on the the story.
When I was about 13 I wanted so badly to come out to everyone. But since my whole family are all very strong Christians, they would never agree with it. Sadly I started going through a very deep depression.
One day my parents sat me down and wanted me to tell them what was wrong and how they could help. I of course didn't want to tell them. But in the ended I did. I said''mom ok listen, I don't know how to tell you this but, im gay.'' Well my mom stated crying and my dad didn't belive me and so he started laughing, im sure because he didn't know what else to do. And of course I started crying to.
my parents freaked out and made me get help for my'' problem''. After coming out to them I thought I would feel a lot better but it only made me feel worse about it all.
I thought that I was sappose to be straight, so I slept with a couple of boys, they were sad attempts to convince myself I was heterosexual, which I know now that im not. So about a year ago I came out to them again, my mom freaked out again because she thought we had taken care of that problem. But I told her that it was never going to go away. Slowly but surely my parents havnt been so up tight about it, but still wont get off my case about it. I love them but sadly I know they will never accept me for me. And I am ok with that because im finally happy with myself!

____________________________________________________
stockton :
10/11/2006 11:51 PM

coming out for me was a long, long process - well, coming out to myself took a while at least. i pretty much knew i was gay at 14, or at least knew i liked guys in a prurient manner, but I didn't fully accept that until around 19. i came out to my mom over the phone while i was at work at a coffee shop. we were fighting over religion (i was raised church of Christ), and I kept bringing up and defending gays, she eventually asked, and i told her the truth. my dad, though, is a different story. my dear friend shawn came out to his parents just before coming back home from his first year at college. his step-mom decided to call my dad at work to tell him that I was gay. so yeah, some stranger my dad had never talked to before outed me to him. needless to say, i was pissed, and so was he.

____________________________________________________
Johnly Phoenix :
10/13/2006 2:45 AM

Well, my coming out story really isn't that dramatic. I was afraid to tell my mom about...why I DON'T KNOW, since she was always so understanding of everything. We were in the car on the way to Dallas, and she asked me "What's wrong?" I told her slowly, "It's serious." She said, "Well come out with it." "Well.....", I said. Noticing that it was hard for me, she said, "What? Are you gay?" I hestitated, then said "Well yeah actually." "Oh my God, don't worry about that! I've known for years, and it doesn't bother me one bit," she said non-chalantly. So yeah, and she ended up blabbing it to the rest of the family, but none of them gave a shit, and love me just as much.Even my old grandma didn't care. I guess I just lucked out. I hear so many coming out horror stories all the time. I have nothing THAT exciting...
~_^


____________________________________________________
Mmmm Hmmmm... :
10/18/2006 8:02 PM

Okay QR... You've PRESSURED me into it; LATE as it is, you wanted my coming out story so here goes:

For those who know me, you know I'm a country boy, born and bred. Despite being italian, my parents are 100% country farm bumpkins. You can understand the hesitation on my part to tell them that *gasp* I like boys. So flashback to year 2000. I, being the cute capable college boy, was dating my first boyfriend *swoon* and having the time of my life. However, the fun soon came to an abrupt end when my boyfriend of 9 months tells me that he is moving to Utah (don't ask). Of course I was devistated. Fate, being the cruel, twisted bitch she is, found me crying my little heart out and decided she'd have my mother call me at the same moment. She asked me what was wrong and, in a moment of weekness, I spilled. Everything. She told me she loved me and that I needed to come home for the weekend and I reluctantly agreed. The weekend rolls around, apprehensive, I packed my clothes and went home to nowheresville,OK. I had a good weekend, very laid back, lots of time to reflect on my newfound freedom, not only from 'love' but also from my shame and confusion. I found myself at the dinner table with my parents and two younger brothers, Sunday evening, carrying on and enjoying the overwhelming feeling that things were actually going to be okay. We were discussing something, I don't even remember what, when my father, in his country-est, hank-williams-junior-est, charlie-daniels-listen-est voice says,"So what the hell's this shit about you bein a queer!?" DEAD. SILENCE. I say,"do what?" and he says,"Do you fuck guys or what!?". Shocked, scared, startled and sullen I say,"Well, I havent yet, but I'm planning on it". He looked at me, I looked at my mom, she looked at him, he looked at her, I looked at him (my brothers had already ran for their lives at this point)and that was it. A few uncomfortable questions and a heated discussion later and I was asked to leave for good. After four months of neglect from my father, I call one day and he answered the phone. This was normally the point where he would hand me off to my mother without a word or hang up altogether. He asked me how I was. Stunned I said,"fine". He said.... "good". A conversation, started with just two words and my world was changed forever. I now am blessed to have the greatest father and mother in the world. Fate... you cruel twisted bitch. I love you......