Sexe : Male
Statut : En couple
Age : 30
Zodiaque: Vierge
Ville : Seattle
Région : Washington
Pays: US
Date d’inscription :: 16/05/2005
|
|
|
|
dimanche, mars 09, 2008
 |
Once upon a time, in a world a little different than this one, some asshole said, "If you love something, set it free."
If love isn't a gilded cage, I don't know what is.
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mardi, mars 04, 2008
 |
You know – I'm quite sick of working for a living.
I've decided that as I cannot change the world, better my fellow man, heal the environment or lead by example, I want money. Lots and lots and lots of money. The kind of money that makes activists ill, makes nipples hard, and acts like a magnet for commercial real estate brokers. And, I want to aquire it in a manner that pisses people off, makes me laugh and leaves my father shaking his head.
The problem is, I don't want to work for it. My passion is the method, the meaning. I have an intense and present desire to thumb my nose at the world and with a heady sophistication go, "Nah-nah!", or something of that sort.
Our world, our societies, they're just so damn silly. And we take it all sooooooooo seriously. Laughing at that paradigm is, I believe, the best good I can do my fellow man.
As to the approach, I have no interest in founding my own 'legitimate' business; I already have one and guess what - I have to work, a lot. A life in which I spend years building profit point onto profit point, investing and re-investing, until one day, in my late forties, when I have no personality left and my family despises me, I would feel that I had arrived. I would likely look back and think that I never should have worked so hard, that money didn't matter, that I had ignored all the important things life had to offer.
No thanks.
I would much rather have money now, thank you very much.
The problem is, I don't have any.
(Which is a problem)
Now, don't get me wrong – I love my job and I love my business; I just have a general impression that I might be much happier donating time (and money) to non-profits, designing pro-bono posters for theatre companies and not having a schedule so that say, sex on a Tuesday at 2:22PM, would be an actual possibility.
So, in honor of this revelation, I'm founding a new company.
It is, at heart, a company of fools – even if I'm the only one currently present. The name of this venture will be Intuition Limited, and our mission will be to find ingenious, inventive, and incorrigible ways to take all possible advantage of the many problems our self obsessed society has. If this company can turn a profit without producing any products, services or items of note, while pissing people off left and right - it will be a success.
Though it did not occur to me until just this moment, my inner child (annoying little fucker) finds inspiration from something John Cusak said before he became chubby, inarticulate and heartwarming (my paraphrase to follow), "I don't want to produce anything sold or bought, buy anything produced or sold, or sell anything produced or bought."
That sums things up nicely.
It is obvious to me that human society is a bumbling, accidental, headless, incompetent and rudderless mess. Blame this on whatever origin you prefer: original sin or the inadvertent nature of organically grown meat bags; we seem to be a bit flawed at our base. Thus, all of our efforts and institutions have these flaws built right into them.
No matter how hard we try, or how well meaning we are, we just have to fuck things up. It's charming really. It's what makes people so loveable – we're just not quite all 'there'; especially as a group. For those who disagree I cite the history of Christianity in Europe, anarchist organizations, bi-polar political systems & women's book clubs; if you need more I'll be happy to oblige (please?).
Which, all in all, is fine – we can't really do much about that.
We are what we are, and luckily we at least have the illusion that we can make progress on an individual basis. The individual, though limited, is blessed with the chance to succeed in competition with his fellow man. This, for many, makes them feel better about the rest of this mess. Knowing that even though I'm made of meat and water, aflood with uncontrollable emotions, beset by obsessions, brimming with hopeless ideas and lost in a sea of billions of fellow grubs – I have the chance to prove that I'm just that 'lil bit smarter, faster and more 'together' than the next mite in the mound.
It's not much, but hey – it's mine.
Aside form loving my family and growth, it's what's available.
So - I figure, 'fuck it', let's do it.
Too often businesses start with an idea for a product or a service. In fact, they almost always start with an idea for a product or a service. Let's not do that.
Instead, let's try to step outside the box a bit and identify opportunities according to the following parameters:
1. Profitability
2. Taking advantage of human stupidity
3. Taking advantage of group think
4. Taking advantage of illusory societal constructions
5. Is not illegal (illegal in this case I define as what can be prosecuted. If we break US laws on foreign soil without extradition – I think that's just dandy) 6. Is almost illegal 7. Really, really, really pisses off narrow minded believers of all kinds (so long as the belief in question is narrow and that they believe it in that, 'How dare you' , sanctimonious sort of way).
8. Requires minimal effort and/or resources
9. Leaves behind nothing of value or substance
10. Fun
I don't think most realize how odd this whole contraption we call commerce really is. The entire societal construct is just… silly. And, I have to tell you, it has holes – lots of them. I have a few ideas lying around to start with but I'm open to any.
This is an open call for membership, and though this sounds silly, I'm quite serious: Intuitors needed.
So, who wants to have some fun?
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
dimanche, février 24, 2008
 |
First, I'd like to say that I'm feeling extremely limited by the category options for Myspace Blogs. I, for one, would like a category titled, 'Humorous Insights into Society and Other Things we Cannot Get Away From". That would be my category. Today, I'd like to talk about Bluetooth. First, let me say that bluetooth sucks. You can't hear anything, no one can hear you, and they look STUPID. If you have to use them, use them WHEN YOU USE THEM. Do not walk around all day going, "blink, blink, blink." Which leads me to my point. Bluetooth Does NOT Make You Look Like a Cool Star Trek Character There are two reasons for this; the first being that there are no cool star trek characters. Now, before you start in on me with, "awww man, but Spock is cool", remember that we're talking about appearance here people, and not a one of those sad sacks looked cool, ever. Admittedly, some of the girls in the 60's go-go outfits had it going, but that is waaaaaay outside the bounds of this discourse. I'm going to move on from this point but I want to warn you, if you plan on jumping in and telling me that your favorite star trek character is cool, you're going to look like an idiot. Everyone will laugh at you and the end result will be that you have done nothing for the standing of said characters 'coolness', simply lowered your own. A lot. The second reason is that no matter how you cut it, dress it up, describe it or spend money to make it happen, having a blinking piece of plastic sticking out of your ear looks ridiculous. People, usually men in-between 35-45, seem to think this addition is the height of fashion. You will see them at starbucks drinking beverages extremely high in fat, looking at underage girls, just dying for someone to call them while their bluetooth, all the while, goes "Blink, blink, blink". How To Spot Your Own Potential for Being one of These Losers What follows is a list of qualities that this demographic seems to possess in abundance. While an individual might have one or two of these indicators, if you have three or more, please be very careful as you make telecommunications purchases. 1. Male 2. Ages 35-45 3. Overweight in a pathetic 'I could try harder' sort of way. This is the American Paunch; a result of bad food, worse beer and failed or failing marriages. As an aside, though I have no proof of this, I believe that men in this demographic are extremely likely to watch REALLY bad porn and masturbate far more than is healthy. 4. No fashion sense whatsoever, while simultaneously possessing the belief that one is dressed very, very, well. Sub-indicators of this quality are: silk shirts, bright ties on bright shirts, tight plaid patterns, dockers of all shapes and sizes, brown belts with big ugly silver buckles, visible white t-shirts under dress shirts, gold chains, other types of chains, bulky watches that say anything other than rolex etc., two tone jewelry (never, ever, ever should a man wear two tone jewelry. jesus.), and bad shoes. 5. The ability to enter a public environment in sweatpants (I do not mean hip adidas work out pants - we're talking Mervyn's here). While this seems like it belongs with the above point, I believe that it is, in fact, a fully separate issue. Sweatpants are so far outside of anything resembling modern fashion (or historic fashion for that matter), that this becomes an immediate red flag. Admittedly, there are two types of people who wear sweatpants in public: good looking people and ugly people. This is a key differentiator. A good looking person wearing sweatpants might be able to create a belief in us that he is simply, "beyond caring", as his ego is full and his self-esteem is legendary. Fair enough. That individual wouldn't fit any of the other indicators. The ugly person wearing sweat pants, however, might as well have a large reader sign over their heads saying things like, "I have no self-esteem" or, "My best friend died in the 4th grade - he will never be replaced", or, "Hey, where'd everybody go?" 6. The goatee, the mustache, the bald spot and the buzz cut. I really don't think anything else needs to be said on this subject. 7. The belief, despite all evidence to the contrary, that one is a successful businessman. A surplus of ideas, leads and potentials while wearing really bad shoes are the surest indicators of this demographic. 8. Being short. I don't know any other way to put this. A lack of physical height seems to greatly increase your chances of falling into this modern social snare. 9. Conservative political beliefs. I don't actually know if this is true. I just feel better believing it. The lesson here is simple - be careful when making telecommunications decisions. There is always, nearby, some judgmental asshole like me just waiting to lampoon your pathetically unaware person. All the while, you go "blink, blink, blink."
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mercredi, avril 18, 2007
 |
America, it seems, needs to come out of the closet.
If one substitutes imperialism for homo-erotic behavior it quickly becomes obvious that our fair lady is a lady just a touch too fair – all is not as it seems.
After years of watching a bumbling foreign policy, I have to say, it is akin to nothing so much as an awkward gay teen in the bathroom, not quite ready to admit what he's doing – to himself or to others.
Notice the hesitancy. The pauses. The rush of aggression. The sudden doubt. The double life.
"But, I just bumped him!" squeals an innocent Jonnie, "It was an accident (insert lisp)!"
No it wasn't.
There was no accident.
It was, without doubt, intentional butt touching.
Jonnie needs to be straight with himself, if he can't be straight.
We know that.
It's obvious to adults, looking at this sort of behavior, that hiding the realities of himself, from himself, will only make Jonnies life harder. Whether homosexuality is a path given or chosen (given), in our culture no one can dispute it's the harder – Jonnie should give himself every chance he can, right?
So let's do ourselves a favor, let's be honest. We don't need to be afraid of what people think. We can be ourselves.
We need to go sit down with Mom and Dad and have a chat.
We could walk over to them, visit, and just be honest.
"England? France?"
"Yeah honey?"
"You know how you guys, right around when you had me, you led alternative lifestyles, with queens and stuff?"
"Uhm-hmm, what's up honey?"
"Well, you know how I swore I'd never do that? Be like that?"
"Mmm-hmm."
"Well, uhm, I am. I'm an empire."
Gasp! Like it's such a big fucking secret.
For proof, let's just look at our heritage, our American heritage.
In the American heritage Dictionary, Empire is defined as such: • A political unit having an extensive territory or comprising a number of territories or nations and ruled by a single supreme authority. • An extensive enterprise under a unified authority. • Imperial or imperialistic sovereignty, domination, or control.
Uhm, hello?
Does anyone (please?) dispute the relationship? Check, check and… check.
To make things painfully clear, here's a list of all major American military conflicts and deployments into foreign countries since 1775. You don't have to read every word(but you should), just get the picture and move on: I have a bit more to say.
Note that instances where the U.S. gave aid alone, with no military personnel involvement, are excluded.
1775-1800 1798-1800 -- Undeclared Naval War with France (Quasi-War).
1800-1809 1801-05 -- Tripoli. 1806 -- Mexico (Spanish territory). 1806-10 -- Gulf of Mexico.
1810-1819 1810 -- West Florida (Spanish territory 1812 – Amelia Island (Spanish territory 1812-15 – War of 1812. 1813 -- West Florida (Spanish territory). 1813-14 – Marquesas Islands. (French Polynesia) 1814 -- Spanish Florida. 1814-25 -- Caribbean. 1815 -- Algiers. 1815 -- Tripoli. 1816 -- Spanish Florida. 1816-18 -- Spanish Florida - First Seminole War. 1817 – Amelia Island(Spanish territory off Florida). 1818 -- Oregon.
1820-1829 1820-23 -- Africa. 1822 -- Cuba. 1823 -- Cuba. 1824 -- Cuba. 1824 -- Puerto Rico (Spanish territory). 1825 -- Cuba. 1827 -- Greece.
1830-1839 1831-32 – Falkland Islands 1832 – Sumatra. 1833 -- Argentina. 1835-36 -- Peru. 1836 -- Mexico. 1838 - The Caroline Affair on Navy Island, Canada. 1838-39 – Sumatra
1840-1849 1840 -- Fiji Islands 1841 -- Drummond Island, Kingsmill Group 1841 – Samoa. 1842 – Mexico 1843 – China 1843 – Africa 1844 – Mexico 1846-48 -- Mexican-American War 1849 – Smyrna (Izmir, Turkey).
1850-1859 1851 – Turkey 1851 -- Johanns Island (east of Africa) 1852-53 -- Argentina. 1853 – Nicaragua 1853-54 -- Japan. 1853-54 -- Ryukyu and Bonin Islands (Japan). 1854 – China 1854 – Nicaragua 1855 – China 1855 -- Fiji Islands 1855 – Uruguay 1856 -- Panama, Republic of New Grenada 1856 – China. 1857 – Nicaragua 1858 – Uruguay 1858 -- Fiji Islands 1858-59 – Turkey 1859 – Paraguay 1859 – Mexico 1859 – China
1860-1869 1860 -- Angola, Portuguese West Africa 1860 -- Colombia, Bay of Panama 1863 -- Japan. 1864 – Japan 1864 – Japan 1865 – Panama 1866 -- Mexico. 1866 – China 1867 – Nicaragua 1867 -- Formosa (island of Taiwan 1868 -- Japan 1868 – Uruguay 1868 – Colombia
1870-1879 1870 – Mexico 1870 -- Hawaiian Islands 1871 – Korea 1873 -- Colombia (Bay of Panama 1873-96 -- Mexico. 1874 -- Hawaiian Islands 1876 – Mexico
1880-1889 1882 – Egypt 1885 – Panama 1888 – Korea 1888 – Haiti 1888-89 – Samoa 1889 -- Hawaiian Islands
1890-1899 1890 – Argentina 1891 – Haiti 1891 -- Bering Strait 1891 – Chile 1893 – Hawaii 1894 – Brazil 1894 – Nicaragua 1894-95 – China 1894-95 – China 1894-96 – Korea 1895 – Colombia 1895-96 – Venezuela 1896 – Nicaragua 1898 – Nicaragua 1898 -- Spanish-American War 1898-99 -- Samoa. 1898-99 – China 1899 – Nicaragua 1899-1913 -- Philippine-American War
1900-1909 1900 – China 1901 -- Colombia (State of Panama 1902 – Colombia 1902 -- Colombia (State of Panama 1903 -- Honduras 1903 -- Dominican Republic 1903 – Syria 1903-04 -- Abyssinia (Ethiopia) 1903-14 – Panama 1904 -- Dominican Republic 1904 -- Tangier, Morocco 1904 – Panama 1904-05 – Korea 1906-09 – Cuba 1907 – Honduras 1910 – Nicaragua
1910-1919 1911 – Honduras 1911 – China 1912 – Honduras 1912 -- Panama. 1912 -- Cuba. 1912 – China 1912 – Turkey 1912-25 – Nicaragua 1912-41 -- China. 1913 – Mexico 1914 – Haiti 1914 -- Dominican Republic 1914-17 -- Mexico. 1915-34 – Haiti 1913 -- Mexico. 1914 – Haiti 1914 -- Dominican Republic. 1914-17 – Mexico 1915-34 -- Haiti. - 1916 -- China. 1916-24 -- Dominican Republic 1917 -- China. 1917-18 -- World War I 1917-22 -- Cuba. 1918-19 – Mexico 1918-20 -- Panama. 1918-20 -- Soviet Union. 1919 -- Dalmatia (Croatia). 1919 – Turkey 1919 – Honduras
1920-1929 1920 -- China. 1920 – Guatemala 1920-22 -- Russia (Siberia). 1921 -- Panama - Costa Rica 1922 – Turkey 1922-23 – China 1924 -- Honduras. 1924 -- China. 1925 – China 1925 – Honduras 1925 -- Panama. 1926-33 -- Nicaragua. 1926 – China 1927 -- China.
1930-1939 1932 – China 1933 -- Cuba. 1934 -- China.
1940-1945 1940 -- Newfoundland, Bermuda, St. Lucia, 1941 -- Greenland. 1941 -- Netherlands (Dutch Guiana 1941 -- Iceland. 1941 -- Germany. 1941-45 -- World War II 1945 -- China.
1945-1949 1945-49 Occupation of part of Germany. 1945-55 Occupation of part of Austria. 1945-46 Occupation of part of Italy.[citation needed] 1945-52 Occupation of Japan. 1945-46 Occupation of the Philippines 1945-49 Occupation of South Korea 1946 -- Trieste (Italy). 1945-47 China 1948 – Palestine 1948 -- Berlin. 1948-49 -- China.
1950-1959 1950-53 -- Korean War. 1950-55 -- Formosa (Taiwan). 1954 -- Guatemala 1954-55 -- China. 1955-63 South Vietnam. 1956 -- Egypt. 1958 -- Lebanon.
1960-1969 1959-60 -- The Caribbean 1962 – Thailand 1962 – Cuba 1963 -- Iraq. 1962-75 – Laos 1964 -- Congo (Zaire 1964 -- Brazil 1959-75 -- Vietnam War 1965 -- Dominican Republic 1967 -- Congo (Zaire 1968 -- Iraq. 1968 -- Cambodia and Laos.
1970-1979 1970 -- Cambodia. 1971 -- Indian Subcontinent. 1973 – Chile 1974 – Cyprus 1975 -- Evacuation from Vietnam 1975 -- Evacuation from Cambodia 1975 -- South Vietnam 1975 – Cambodia 1976 – Lebanon 1976 – Korea 1978 -- Zaire (Congo
1980-1990 1980 -- Iran. 1981 -- El Salvador 1981 --Libya. 1982 – Sinai 1982 – Lebanon 1982-1983 – Lebanon 1983 – Egypt 1983 – Grenada 1983-89 – Honduras 1983 – Chad 1984 -- Persian Gulf 1985 – Italy 1986 – Libya 1986 – Libya 1986 – Bolivia 1987-88 -- Persian Gulf 1987-88 -- Operation Earnest Will 1987-88 -- Operation Prime Chance 1988 – Iran 1988 -- Operation Golden Pheasant 1988 -- Iran Air Flight 655 1988 -- Panama. 1989 – Libya 1989 – Panama 1989 -- Colombia, Bolivia, and Peru. 1989 – Philippines 1989-90 – Panama 1990 – Liberia 1990 -- Saudi Arabia
1991-1999 1991 -- Iraq. Persian Gulf War 1991 – Iraq 1991 -- Zaire. 1991-96 -- Operation Provide Comfort 1992 -- Sierra Leone. 1992 – Kuwait 1992-2003 -- Iraq. Iraqi No-Fly Zones 1992-95 – Somalia 1993-Present -- Bosnia/Yugoslavia/Kosovo. 1993 – Macedonia 1993-95 -- Haiti. 1994 – Macedonia 1995 -- Bosnia. 1996 -- Liberia. 1996 -- Central African Republic. 1997 – Albania 1997 -- Congo and Gabon 1997 -- Sierra Leone. 1997 – Cambodia 1998 – Iraq 1998 -- Guinea-Bissau. 1998 - 1999 Kenya and Tanzania. 1998 -- Afghanistan and Sudan 1998 – Liberia 1999 - 2001 East Timor 1999 -- Serbia
2000- present 2000 -- Sierra Leone 2000 -- Yemen. 2001 -- Afghanistan. US invasion of Afghanistan 2002 – Yemen 2002 – Philippines 2002 -- Cote d'Ivoire. 2003 -- 2003 invasion of Iraq 2003 -- Liberia. 2003 -- Georgia and Djibouti 2004 -- Haïti 2004 -- Georgia, Djibouti, Kenya, Ethiopia, Yemen, and Eritrea. 2006 -- Pakistan. 2006 -- Lebanon. 2007 -- Somalia.
…
…..
wow.
That's one fuckload of inadvertent butt touching.
That's so much butt touching that I just don't really know what to say about it. In the parlance of this diatribe – we seem to have our hands up the ass of the world.
If you took a global map and colored in all the countries we've attacked with rainbow colors, what would you have?
Planet Rainbow! (que disco)
Jonnie is positively raving gay with this score card.
What a resume.
"Excuse me," (lisping) "I saw an add for foreign imperialists?"
"Umm-hmm; and are you qualified?"
"Oh yeah!" (major lisping) "I've been back dooring my neighbors for so long that they don't even complain anymore! Seems like I have to go all the way around the world just to find some action!"
He obviously has a few issues, dontcha think?
You should see him on vacation! Watch, as he tours the world!
"Uhm, excuse me small impoverished brown skinned person," (lisping) "Do you speak English?"
"…"
"Totally Excellent! You mind if I ask you a few questions? No? Great! Is everyone in your country small, brown and impoverished? Yes? Excellent! Do you have any smart technologies, nuclear weapons or treaties in place that could hurt American trade consumption? No? Excellent! Can you say Jihad? Would you mind if I filmed it?"
And, with all this, Americans drive around with 'Free Tibet' on the backs of their cars.
….
uhm.
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.
That is so completely fucking ridiculous!
Please – free Tibet! So we can bomb it! Hell – we won't even bomb it; we'll have a robot bomb it!
New! From America! Get killed by Robots!
OH MY GOD!
This was going to be funny, that was my intent, but I am PISSED.
It's that list - oh, Jonnie. I knew it would be big but I had no idea, I hadn't let myself think about it.
It was just so huge. It… it… penetrated me.
?
I used to be political; I stopped.
I swear.
Something about some idiot losing the popular vote, as well as the electoral vote, and still getting elected because his brother was governor of one state and his dad the previous president.: kinda a cast a pall on 'democracy' for me.
Rose colored glasses and all that.
Jesus America, wake up.
How many fucking people have to die for you?
Oh, wait – they aren't people are they? They're just sand niggers, chinks, japs, frogs, niggers, spics, wops, micks, pakis, mahatmas, heathens and unbelievers aren't they?
America – look at yourself.
Just who the fuck do you think you actually are?
Fuck it.
I'm done.
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
mercredi, avril 11, 2007
 |
The worst misconception in regards to men is that there is anything motivating them besides sex.
Don't get me wrong, we want other things; but believe me - it all relates back. Keep in mind at all times that there is a direct connection between the beating of the heart and the infusion of blood into... you get the idea.
The following is a quick synopsis of male approaches to sexuality. The descriptions do not only apply to a sexually active relationship - these forces drive all emotions, confusion and interactions.
Types of men:
1. The Guilty Some men feel guilty about wanting sex (blame it on parents, blame it on idiocy - what have you) and so they bury it beneath layers upon layers of righteousness, sensitivity and/or indifference.
This, of course, is bullshit.
The sensitive type, of so loving and never seeming to chase your ass, is actually a hungering ravenous beast on the inside. These guys, no matter that women see them as 'nice' and 'sweet' give me the creeps. At younger ages they are, for the most part, relatively benign, but it is this writers opinion that these men are most likely to, in their late thirties/forties, kill women and bathe in their blood while crying. iot's the crying part that scares me. We see these guys on the six o'clock news all the time.
The righteous type, while less dangerous, makes me sick. Any man who pretends to a faith so strong that he no longer has a sex drive is LYING. If the boy is lying to you - just get him to admit it and shuffle him into a new category. If the boy is lying to himself, run. Honest faith is a beautiful thing; faith used to create self deception is, to my mind, the least attractive possible comonent of a person. It's like beating a cripple with a crutch - it's an easy out. The down side of all this is that these guys tend to be in shape and seem very confident; just realize that they have no idea who they are and be careful when you give your heart to them.
The indiferent are a mystery to me. It's almost as if, seeing in themselves something they couldn't really control, they simply pretend it doesn't exist. These people don't piss me off, they don't scare me - i just wonder at how good of a friend they can be to someone when their reaction to something of importance, such as this, is to ignore it.
2. The Frightened Many men, some of the best of them actually, are terrified by sex. Some by sex itself (these guys are just as odd to me as i can fathom), most by the percieved power it gives their partner.
The 'I'm afraid of sex' contingent are the oddest men in existence. I am positive that they all laugh through their noses and drink sprite. These men are often labeled gay simply because they are often so shy. I wouldn't what to advise in regards to one of these. I imagine that they cannot quite realize their potential until after they have experienced sex and so, for a discriminating christian girl, they are probably quite a gamble.
The 'I'm a afraid of the power sex gives my partner' contingent makes more sense to me. While i try to fight this tendency in myself, i often find that the sheer intensity of the desires I feel inside lend waaaaaaaaaaaay too much power to my partner. Now, the thing is, most of us realize that women didn't ask for this power and that most want nothing to do with it. Tough. That's life. Men with this perspective can often appear aloof, hard to pin down and/or have flip floping emotions. The more independent and strong willed the boy, the more intense this will be.
3. The Ravenous Other men, instead of hiding and/or lying, indudge and or admit. These are men who quite often come across as rather intense. This can be both bad or good; figuring out which can be difficult. It is my opinion that both the best of men and the worst will be found in this catergory. The very idea in this is self honesty, it is the lengths to which it is taken and the application which matter.
The indudgent side of the coin is the man who admits to himself that he is a ravenous beast and believes that induldging said beast is a justification to itself. These men will lie, cheat, steal and (bassicaly) do anything they want with little regard for others. And, they can be patient - this is a predator - be careful.
The addmitant side is the man who knows he is a ravenous beast and tempers that with love, empathy and an attempt at self control. Thsiis the self honest sexual male; your only safe bet. The problem is, since the indulgent lie - these two look the same. greatest risk fo rthe greatest gain i suppose.
The key is to rememeber that sex is the primary motivator in all of our interactions. Doesn't really matter whether you think god designed us or nature wound up with us; the facts are still the same.
The male mind is hardwired for sex. Love, status, power - it all goes back to sex.
Hell, the only reason we're even here is because of sex - so that we can have sex.
It's the fundamental purpose of life.
The problem is, women think the purpose of life is psychological love; which is wrong. That love exists so that we pair bond and continue the species.
You know, sex.
Both sides agree that Love and Sex are immensely important; it is simply that for the average man, love exists to support sex while for the average woman (out on a limb here) it is the opposite - sex existing to support love.
So, bear it all in mind, don't hold it against us, and remember what elmer fudd said - "Be vwarry vwarry careful".
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
jeudi, février 08, 2007
 |
Just before the world almost (but not quite) ended, Peter turned to Tink, an ashen expression smeared across his face and he said, "Now's the time, kiddo."
"Now?" She said, confused and anxious – happy and sad; all rolled into one.
He smiled then, a smile that said clearly, "Yes, now," and "No, not now," and "Isn't this what you wanted?" and "What the hell are you asking me for Tink, this was your idea!" without ever having to say a word.
Her eyebrow, just a speck of light, arched in a perfectly contrary fashion.
His smile stammered, limping long from cheek to cheek, his uncertainty evident, his resolve clearing.
"Now."
And so they leaped; feet free from the bounds of gravity, hearts in their hands, reality a swiftly fading blur behind them as they sped into the night.
That, is how the story almost (but not quite) ends.
It's beginnings are a bit more obscure, but - beginnings usually are. People and places, actions and events, all tumbled about, like so many rocks in a jar, until one day, one moment, something clicks.
Just a glimmer.
And it happens, like magic.
A story is born.
Birth, it should be noted, is a reportedly painful process.
This is no different.
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
jeudi, février 08, 2007
 |
So, it occurs to me that love isn't blind, it's stupid.
Before you freak out and assume all sorts of things - understand that I mean stupid as in a slightly retarded child. Slow on the uptake, comprised of awkward moments, odd pauses and strange mannerisms, love it seems is much akin to repeatedly bumping into a wall… while giggling.
There seems to be a lot of unnecessary giggling involved.
I guess what I'm saying is that love isn't stupid; love is a slightly retarded male in-between the ages of twelve and fourteen.
What can I say -
I have women on the mind.
Admittedly, this is different from other times in no way whatsoever. Now, there's a reason for this, and it has far less to do with breasts than you might think.
Women are dismaying creatures; they're sticky, they smell funny, they're completely contradictory and yet… we can't get enough of them.
It's horrible. What's worse, they think the same things about us. They despise us, resent us for peeing standing up and find our double standards regarding sex, laundry and bathrooms totally unacceptable.
And yet, we want them all the more.
Why?
It has to be biology. Nothing else explains it. If you really think about it, as a man, there's just no reason for all of this otherwise. Women, likely, have a reason for a mate that has to do with keeping warm at night, seeing as all of them seem to be engineered to freeze at sixty degrees.
Perhaps this is biology as well. Having failed to install a proper sex drive in many women, Darwin's ghost realized that if he made them cold so they would be inclined to cuddle constantly, men would be unable to resist saying, "Hey baby? You awake? You have a headache? No? You wanna do it?"
And thus the species perpetuates itself.
I think we look at women, especially the ones which we might adore, and marvel that something so sweet could be so dangerous. It's worse than a deer in the headlights; when you've got it – it's endless fascination.
Women, I believe, often think we aren't paying attention. It's not true. Part of being a male in relation to love is often say things such as, "Huh?", "What?", "Hmm?" and so on – it's not our fault; we're perpetually mystified by the amount of power you possess in our lives, and occasionally, we're thinking about your breasts.
We can't help it.
Now, biologically speaking, it's all rather disgusting. From ejaculation to birth, everything involved with sex is really quite horrid. Sex, the least anti-septic of activities, is the clearest indication we have, besides republicans and warfare, that we aren't quite as evolved as we like to think.
And that's just the beginning of the story. To top it all off, just to make sure that it's more than we could possibly handle, we have love, the subject at hand.
A socio-biological monstrosity if ever there was one.
Wonderful.
Ok, so here we are; obsessing about rubbing ourselves against our mates, unable to think about anything else, we realize, without warning, that we love them. This, I must tell you, is a terrifying realization. The reason it is so frightening is that it's something you realize all at once, like a prism revealing things that were there all along. An understanding snaps into place in your mind, previous actions which seemed quite innocent at the time take on new and tangible meaning.
It is an abrupt awareness that you have no control of anything and that you are likely doomed. And, to make things worse, you're happy about it.
Disgustedly, you realize that you want to cuddle. You think back and realize that when you think about a certain someone you have a tendency to sigh, audibly, as if the world cared. Upon reflection, it occurs to you, that some time back you began making little mewing noises at your partner and, worse, felt rushes of happiness sweep down your spine when they made them back. Likely, when not around, you feel this wretched yearning sensation in your gut for your partner, as if there was some problem that needed to be solved, that contact, for a moment, would make it all better.
This last leads to the most upsetting element of the realization of love, the 'I miss you' conversation. Evidently the most impaired and insipid of all demonstrations regarding the stupidity of love, when we observe someone in this state we are simultaneously nauseated, jealous and angry at ourselves for feeling so. Even if we're the ones doing it. Go figure.
Observe:
"Hello?" (hesitation)
"Hi."
"I miss you." (nervous voice, slight hesitation)
"I miss you too."
"I love you." (boldness)
"I love you too."
"I yearn for you. I make little mewing noises in my sleep when I think about you." (whining emotional vomit)
"…"
"You don't miss me as much as I miss you." (regrouping)
"Yes I do, I miss you more"
"Do you?" (confirmation)
"I miss you all the time."
"I miss you all the time." (parity)
"I know. I miss you."
"…"
"…"
"Hello?" (repeat indefinitely)
Jesus wept. Grown men, hunter gatherer types, making pathetic little whining noises into a plastic hand held device looking for an emotional fix. What bizarre opium is this? The man in question, and at this point that is a question, is destined for some absurd obscenity of a future – be it happy or tragic or both.
It is, it seems, completely unavoidable. No matter how clear you might be in your mind, how sharp your realization of emotional dynamics, no matter how strong your will or your understanding of self; a moment comes and you think about breasts or a smile at just the wrong time and WHAM!
It's over.
Someone please shoot me.
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|
lundi, janvier 29, 2007
 |
So, once, it occurred to me that I'm a conscious bag of water stuck to the side of a spinning ball of dirt. A dire situation to be sure, I immediately tried to assess what I should do. The first thing to occur to me, after wondering at why the ball was spinning, was: leave the dirt ball. There's two ways to do that:
1: Actually leave the dirt ball. Likely in a pressurized beer can coated with ceramic tiles; this seems an unrealistic solution, especially as there is in fact nowhere else to go. 2: Become a non-conscious bag of water stuck to a ball of dirt. Again, a less than novel solution, specifically as I might very well 'awake' (presuming you accept a post mortem actuality) stuck on yet another dirt ball, or worse, a dirt cylinder. I have no respect for dirt cylinders, they're simply inelegant. Realizing that I am in fact stuck being stuck on a dirt ball; I endeavored to find ways and means of escaping my awareness of said predicament. Being a conscious bag of water it seemed likely to me that perhaps I could convince myself I was a conscious box of grape nuts instead. That would, at the least, be more interesting. Several methods of becoming unaware of my stuckness pressed themselves upon me (I love being pressed upon - it's just so dirty). the below items are a sampling of the methods and means used in attempts to reduce this awareness: 1: Bend my mind. Through the direct application of every drug known to man; systematically mixing types, dosages and activities so as to narrow in on the ideal method for reducing my awareness of said stuckness. Also included in this treatment were the application of sleep deprivation (with and without chemical modification), lack of food, lack of liquids, lack of social interaction and, of course, lack of context. This, unfortunately, does not work. One simply becomes more aware of their stuckness with the liberal application of addictive substances. Also, as you endeavor to unstick yourself in this fashion, you simply become more mired in other things. Gradually, as you struggle, you become aware that everything is just... sticky. 2: Call for help. I'm talking about the direct application for help to every purported higher power available. There are, as you know, many myths, legends and superstitions regarding the various deities, demi-gods, demons, powers and essences about that might be called upon for help. I tried every single one. Seriously. I even, long ago, at midnight, on the lawn of a church, went as far as to attempt to summon the devil. No luck. Still stuck. Thamaturgic ritual, séance, meditation, prayer. All flops in this context. While I did, in this investigation, experience many very strange things, I was left with the conclusion, at the time, that if a higher power had heard my call, they were determined that I not only remain stuck to the dirt ball, but conscious of it as well. Thanks. 3: Become God. The next logical step, as the previous investigation had not succeeded, this one, initially a very tall order, quickly became easier to encompass when I realized that being a conscious bag of water, and thus rather easy to manipulate, I need not actually become God objectively. Subjectively would do the trick. So, for a very short while, after intense effort involving things I won't tell you about, I achieved my goal. For about two and a half hours, I managed to completely convince myself that I was, in point of fact, God. Now, before you jump to any conclusions, let me tell you - that really sucked. Ranked with such moments as realizing Santa wasn't real and that I wasn't actually married to my wife, dismaying doesn't even begin to describe it. Still quite stuck, I walked away from that with something I don't think many people have, empathy for god. Even if you don't believe, I recommend that you give a shout out to him/her/it, even if based solely on the premise that if you were god, you would want the figments of your imagination to pay attention to you. 4: Become intensely involved in unhealthy codependent relationships with women. This, a seemingly tried and true method, while distracting, is not a successful solution. This is, in the end, simply being stuck to something else. You're still aware that you're stuck. While not so much aware that you're stuck to the ball of dirt, you are likely to become increasingly aware that you are stuck to another bag of water and in grave danger of becoming a puddle. Being a puddle on a dirt ball is, understandably, not to be desired as you would quickly become mud. Having explored this option quite thoroughly, I have found it to be the least appealing of the solutions so far. 5: Become unglued. This, on the surface, appears to be the ideal solution to stuckness. I mean, seriously now, it just makes sense. However, upon application, I discovered that one is just left with so many flailing sticky appendages. What winds up happening is this; you stick to everything, with little or no discrimination. This is a very good way to get dirty very quickly. You will attract and retain all sorts of things, most of which will have no common components and will thus be nearly impossible to reconcile with one another. While novel, this solution produced more problems and difficulties than I care to examine and will thus move on, now. 6: Focus on the Now. An attempt to become hyper aware of my consciousness itself, and thus less aware of my other components, focusing on the now did not work. I quickly became aware that there is in fact no 'now' and that not only am I conscious bag of water, I also appear to be a standing wavefront of incredibly complex algorithms propagating forward in the context of time and relying upon 'memory' for all basis whatsoever. Great. This immediately led to the realization that 'I think therefore I am' simply does not cut it as, it should be clear, I don't think. I think I thought. Duh. Within days I was trying to explain 'I think I thought I think, therefore I think I thought I think I am' to pretty girls at parties expecting to get laid as a result. . . . It has been, without doubt, a long journey. 7: Tunnel. While not enabling an escape from the dirt ball itself, this solution seemed to have potential in that I would no longer be stuck to a dirt ball, I would be stuck in it. A change of scene as it were. Tunneling, into dirt or the self, seems to lead nowhere at all. Assuming one doesn't possess a streak of claustrophobia, this is an endless and inherently purposeless process that accomplishes nothing. I would recommend, as a substitute, compulsive masturbation or OCD. Perhaps both. These are equally pointless but at least allow momentary release and the semblance of progress; even if in fact there is none to be had. The masturbation, on a positive note for insomniacs, is likely to have the added side effect of increased sleep. Tunneling, it seems, is fruitless in this sense, but always a great way to get your hands dirty. 8: Be an idiot. Somewhere, right now, some idiot is having a ball being a complete fool and blissfully unaware of either that fact or his stuckness. Fucker' stole my fun. If you see him, hit him for me. Now, don't get me wrong, I can be an idiot. Oh yeah. I just don't get to be a happy unaware idiot. Bastards. The seething nastiness surrounding this solution is that it might well work for others; I simply seem to be exempt. So, if you're a happy oblivious idiot who can encompass the subject matter at hand, please, simply wander off and bump into something. 9: Be an artist. I thought that, maybe, if I drew enough pictures of people floating in the air in other worlds, I would feel less stuck to the dirt in this one. Nada. No matter how many worlds I imagined, drew, wrote of or told tales about - none of it changed the apparent reality of this one a single bit. While a nice thing to do for others, enabling them, perhaps, to forget their stuckness for a moment as they gander about your imaginarium, the artist himself is likely to become increasingly aware of his stuckness the more he creates vistas of non-stuck realities. This is known as inversion theory... no it's not. I just made that up. On the other hand, artists who do not create non-stuck realities but instead depict, accurately, this one - are simply stuck and boring (but safe from that inverse law thingy I was talking about – this is why I draw flowers). They are, as my mother would be wont to say, not using their imaginations. A heinous crime to be sure. 10: Buy lots and lots of shiny toys. Not so much a solution as a distraction, this endeavor has the net opposite effect of it's intention. At the worst you become stuck in debt, at the best you are stuck with a bunch of stuff that you have to take everywhere you go. The shinyer (I insist that this is in fact a word) the toy, the heavier it seems to be. A factor to take into account is that big screen tvs, nice sofas and commercial quality appliances are very heavy. When carrying them, you will feel more stuck than ever. Recently, on a second, and brief, swing through this pattern, I explored mobile shiny toys. Technology has enabled us access to many things which enable us the illusion of mobility. I would remind you that possessions, by their nature, are possessive. Also, if you're not careful, you could wind up being the guy who always wears the Bluetooth. I hate that. Please, take it off. And don't wear sweat pants. So, whether you're stuck on yourself, stuck to another or simply stuck; take solace. We're all stuck in this together, and we're all, at our base, equally stuck. Besides, ask a five year old, being sticky is fun. But that, I'm afraid, is another story.
Optimisé par  | | Anglais | | Albanais | | Arabe | | Bulgare | | Catalan | | Chinois | | Croate | | Tchèque | | Danois | | Néerlandais | | Estonien | | Philippin | | Finnois | | Français | | Galicien | | Allemand | | Grec | | Hébreu | | Hindi | | Hongrois | | Indonésien | | Italien | | Japonais | | Coréen | | Letton | | Lituanien | | Maltais | | Norvégien | | Polonais | | Portugais | | Roumain | | Russe | | Serbe | | Slovaque | | Slovène | | Espagnol | | Suédois | | Thaï | | Turc | | Ukrainien | | Vietnamien |
|
|
|
|